From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/10194 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Moore Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: old entries in .newsrc.eld.. Date: 11 Mar 1997 11:37:02 -0800 Sender: dmoore@sdnp5.ucsd.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.105) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035150104 22978 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:41:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:41:44 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id LAA03008 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 11:46:20 -0800 Original-Received: from mailbox2.ucsd.edu (mailbox2.ucsd.edu [132.239.1.54]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 20:35:04 +0100 Original-Received: from sdnp5.ucsd.edu (sdnp5.ucsd.edu [132.239.79.10]) by mailbox2.ucsd.edu (8.8.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id LAA29309 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 11:34:56 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by sdnp5.ucsd.edu (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id LAA25841; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 11:37:02 -0800 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no X-Face: "oX;zS#-JU$-,WKSzG.1gGE]x^cIg!hW.dq>.f6pzS^A+(k!T|M:}5{_%>Io<>L&{hO7W4cicOQ|>/lZ1G(m%7iaCf,6Qgk0%%Bz7b2-W3jd0m_UG\Y;?]}4s0O-U)uox>P3JN)9cm]O\@,vy2e{`3pb!"pqmRy3peB90*2L Mail-Copies-To: never In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of 11 Mar 1997 05:51:36 +0100 Original-Lines: 24 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.17/XEmacs 19.15 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10194 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10194 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > Andy Eskilsson writes: > > > Looking in my .newsrc.eld I see lots of numbers :-) Articles > > marked/saved replied for the different newsgroups, are these, and if > > so when are they purged?? > > Old marks are supposed to be removed when they fall outside of the > active range of the group. Which of course means that if you have even 1 item in the cache from 3 years ago, nothing since then will ever get purged. Perhaps it'd be a good idea to intersect these with the union of the real active range and the items in the cache. Using the current approach of taking the smallest number in the real active & cache and the largest number in real active & cache leaves a lot to be desired. -- David Moore | Computer Systems Lab __o UCSD Dept. Computer Science - 0114 | Work: (619) 534-8604 _ \<,_ La Jolla, CA 92093-0114 | Fax: (619) 534-1445 (_)/ (_) | In a cloud bones of steel.