From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/9565 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Moore Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: OffGnus Date: 22 Jan 1997 21:29:26 -0800 Sender: dmoore@sdnp5.ucsd.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035149570 19214 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:32:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:32:50 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id WAA13661 for ; Wed, 22 Jan 1997 22:01:16 -0800 Original-Received: from UCSD.EDU (mailbox2.ucsd.edu [132.239.1.54]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Thu, 23 Jan 1997 06:32:31 +0100 Original-Received: from sdnp5.ucsd.edu (sdnp5.ucsd.edu [132.239.79.10]) by UCSD.EDU (8.8.3/8.6.9) with SMTP id VAA29147 for ; Wed, 22 Jan 1997 21:31:53 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by sdnp5.ucsd.edu (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id VAA29111; Wed, 22 Jan 1997 21:29:26 -0800 Original-To: "(ding) Gnus Mailing List" X-Face: "oX;zS#-JU$-,WKSzG.1gGE]x^cIg!hW.dq>.f6pzS^A+(k!T|M:}5{_%>Io<>L&{hO7W4cicOQ|>/lZ1G(m%7iaCf,6Qgk0%%Bz7b2-W3jd0m_UG\Y;?]}4s0O-U)uox>P3JN)9cm]O\@,vy2e{`3pb!"pqmRy3peB90*2L Mail-Copies-To: never In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of 23 Jan 1997 03:50:26 +0100 Original-Lines: 25 X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.80/XEmacs 19.15 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9565 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9565 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > 1) Always downloads all headers, and > 2) Uses a scoring scheme to say what articles to download, and > also downloads articles that have been manually marked for > download, no matter what their scores are. > > The scoring scheme can be any normal Gnus scoring scheme -- "From", > "Lines", "Subject", whatever. All headers to all articles (downloaded > or not) will of course appear in the summary buffer. Unless you want > them to. I think you are agreeing as long as the prefetch is based on a new score field like (prefetch -100) get everything with score -100 or better. If it's based on a notion of mark or expunge, then you don't want a line's field in there. You might also want conditionalized scoring, either being more or less liberal in the prefetch than you do for your normal scoring. -- David Moore | Computer Systems Lab __o UCSD Dept. Computer Science - 0114 | Work: (619) 534-8604 _ \<,_ La Jolla, CA 92093-0114 | Fax: (619) 534-1445 (_)/ (_) | In a cloud bones of steel.