From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/9151
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: David Moore <dmoore@UCSD.EDU>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: bug (or feature?) in gnus-summary-next-page
Date: 09 Dec 1996 12:59:57 -0800
Sender: dmoore@sdnp5.ucsd.edu
Message-ID: <rvd8wjigc2.fsf@sdnp5.ucsd.edu>
References: <gfu3pvfodv.fsf@mixcoatl.in.tu-clausthal.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035149220 16750 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:27:00 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:27:00 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2])
          by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP
	  id NAA15252 for <steve@miranova.com>; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 13:16:57 -0800
Original-Received: from UCSD.EDU (mailbox1.ucsd.edu [132.239.1.53]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <WAA10645@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 22:01:34 +0100
Original-Received: from sdnp5.ucsd.edu (sdnp5.ucsd.edu [132.239.79.10]) by UCSD.EDU (8.8.3/8.6.9) with SMTP id NAA12321 for <ding@ifi.uio.no>; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 13:01:32 -0800 (PST)
Original-Received: by sdnp5.ucsd.edu (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id MAA20681; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 12:59:57 -0800
Original-To: "(ding) Gnus Mailing List" <ding@ifi.uio.no>
In-Reply-To: Burkhard Knopf's message of 09 Dec 1996 21:34:20 +0100
Original-Lines: 21
X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.74/XEmacs 19.14
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9151
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9151

Burkhard Knopf <burkhard.knopf@informatik.tu-clausthal.de> writes:
> Let's say you got a posting that fits in the *Article* window with
> some hidden header lines. Then you show those (typing "t") which makes
> the article longer that what you see now in the window. Trying to see
> the rest of the posting by typing " " (gnus-summary-next-page) won't
> show that but rather get the next unread article.

	I've started seeing this to, actually it happens every time, now
that I think about it.  Might just be an xemacs thing?

> I can't remember having seen that in September Gnus, and I don't like
> it either. But who am I to criticize such a nice package ...

	I think it broke around the time of the summary buffer code
rewrite?  It definitely worked in most of the .6* rgnus.

-- 
David Moore <dmoore@ucsd.edu>       | Computer Systems Lab      __o
UCSD Dept. Computer Science - 0114  | Work: (619) 534-8604    _ \<,_
La Jolla, CA 92093-0114             | Fax:  (619) 534-1445   (_)/ (_)
<URL:http://oj.egbt.org/dmoore/>    | Solo Furnace Creek 508 -- 1996!