From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/8936
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: David Moore <dmoore@UCSD.EDU>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Manually changing respooling destinations
Date: 24 Nov 1996 14:54:50 -0800
Organization: UCSD Peripheral Nerve Research Group
Sender: dmoore@sdnp5.ucsd.edu
Message-ID: <rvhgmf5cjp.fsf@sdnp5.ucsd.edu>
References: <8jybfygqz3.fsf@nynexst.com> <0fk9rg97gb.fsf@fraxinus.daimi.aau.dk> <whk9rfwyij.fsf@norne.metis.no> <m2enhnh2x3.fsf@proletcult.ifi.uio.no> <whbucquyeo.fsf@norne.metis.no> <m2sp62w3rb.fsf@proletcult.ifi.uio.no> <whralktw8t.fsf@norne.metis.no> <m2ralkpl90.fsf@proletcult.ifi.uio.no> <whiv6vtv60.fsf@norne.metis.no>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035149039 15464 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:23:59 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:23:59 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: (qmail 3915 invoked from smtpd); 24 Nov 1996 23:04:59 -0000
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@129.240.64.2)
  by deanna.miranova.com with SMTP; 24 Nov 1996 23:04:47 -0000
Original-Received: from UCSD.EDU (mailbox1.ucsd.edu [132.239.1.53]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <XAA24808@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Sun, 24 Nov 1996 23:56:09 +0100
Original-Received: from sdnp5.ucsd.edu (sdnp5.ucsd.edu [132.239.79.10]) by UCSD.EDU (8.8.3/8.6.9) with SMTP id OAA22197 for <ding@ifi.uio.no>; Sun, 24 Nov 1996 14:56:07 -0800 (PST)
Original-Received: by sdnp5.ucsd.edu (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id OAA01708; Sun, 24 Nov 1996 14:54:51 -0800
Original-To: "(ding) Gnus Mailing List" <ding@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Lines: 26
X-Newsreader: Red Gnus v0.70/XEmacs 19.14
In-Reply-To: Steinar Bang's message of 24 Nov 1996 15:38:47 +0100
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8936
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8936


	From gnu.emacs.gnus.  My nntp server seems to have a full disk
and won't let me post, how thrilling.

Steinar Bang <sb@metis.no> writes:

> > Sorry; I meant `gnus-move-split-methods'.
> 
> Changing the above to 
> 	(setq gnus-move-split-methods ...
> didn't change the behaviour (ie. nothing happened).

	The contents of gnus-original-article-buffer are not set to the
article being moved before gnus-read-move-group-name calls
gnus-get-split-value.  And the later routine wants to look in that
buffer for the headers.  gnus-original-article-buffer will typically
have nothing in it it, or the last article you looked at.

	You can probabl make things work by first selecting the article,
unmarking any read marks that just got added and then trying to move it.

	Something in gnus-summary-move-article should probably try to
get the correct article in that buffer if it's not already.


-- 
David Moore <dmoore@ucsd.edu>       | Computer Systems Lab      __o
UCSD Dept. Computer Science - 0114  | Work: (619) 534-8604    _ \<,_
La Jolla, CA 92093-0114             | Fax:  (619) 534-1445   (_)/ (_)
<URL:http://oj.egbt.org/dmoore/>    | Solo Furnace Creek 508 -- 1996!