From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/9007 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Moore Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Danger! Danger! Date: 26 Nov 1996 19:07:31 -0800 Sender: dmoore@sdnp5.ucsd.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035149098 15925 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:24:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:24:58 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 11104 invoked from smtpd); 27 Nov 1996 03:18:44 -0000 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@129.240.64.2) by deanna.miranova.com with SMTP; 27 Nov 1996 03:18:43 -0000 Original-Received: from UCSD.EDU (mailbox2.ucsd.edu [132.239.1.54]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Wed, 27 Nov 1996 04:08:55 +0100 Original-Received: from sdnp5.ucsd.edu (sdnp5.ucsd.edu [132.239.79.10]) by UCSD.EDU (8.8.3/8.6.9) with SMTP id TAA27432 for ; Tue, 26 Nov 1996 19:08:53 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by sdnp5.ucsd.edu (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id TAA05415; Tue, 26 Nov 1996 19:07:32 -0800 Original-To: "(ding) Gnus Mailing List" In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of 27 Nov 1996 02:49:43 +0100 Original-Lines: 41 X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.71/XEmacs 19.14 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9007 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9007 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > David Moore writes: > > > But definitely with 0.70, I'm seeing that if I Gcc myself > > something and also get the same message via mail, the odds seem high of > > that thing showing up as 'already read'. But I think it's also > > happening with other incoming mail, so it's probably not just a gcc > > problem. > > Hm. You're not using duplicate suppression or something like that? I file my detected duplicates into a folder that I clear manually, currently. What happens is that if I gcc myself and also get a copy, that often now, the real copy will arrive via email and be filed into the correct group (ie, not the duplicate group), but will have the read mark set (or something). Maybe I can see if I can make this reproducable. Previous versions would not hide the real copy of message, ie, both would show up in the summary listing. Now I do a unix 'from', se I have the message. I do 'M-2 g', I watch it file. Often the unread counter goes up by the appropriate amount. I go into the group, and that message isn't shown to me. I use nnmail-split-history to get the article number, use 'j' to go to it. And it's there, but has been marked as read for some reason. But maybe this is related to some other more generic hiding of messages, it's hard to tell if I've missed mail or not...which is a bit disturbing. Maybe something in the code is using the wrong active range to truncate the unread/ticked/etc lists. That could explain all of these problems, although doesn't make it easy to find. -- David Moore | Computer Systems Lab __o UCSD Dept. Computer Science - 0114 | Work: (619) 534-8604 _ \<,_ La Jolla, CA 92093-0114 | Fax: (619) 534-1445 (_)/ (_) | Solo Furnace Creek 508 -- 1996!