From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/10425 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Moore Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: file descriptor usage? Date: 30 Mar 1997 13:57:45 -0800 Sender: dmoore@sdnp5.ucsd.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035150298 24342 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:44:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:44:58 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id OAA24851 for ; Sun, 30 Mar 1997 14:03:52 -0800 Original-Received: from mailbox2.ucsd.edu (mailbox2.ucsd.edu [132.239.1.54]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Sun, 30 Mar 1997 23:56:01 +0200 Original-Received: from sdnp5.ucsd.edu (sdnp5.ucsd.edu [132.239.79.10]) by mailbox2.ucsd.edu (8.8.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id NAA23531 for ; Sun, 30 Mar 1997 13:56:00 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by sdnp5.ucsd.edu (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id NAA01266; Sun, 30 Mar 1997 13:57:45 -0800 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no X-Face: "oX;zS#-JU$-,WKSzG.1gGE]x^cIg!hW.dq>.f6pzS^A+(k!T|M:}5{_%>Io<>L&{hO7W4cicOQ|>/lZ1G(m%7iaCf,6Qgk0%%Bz7b2-W3jd0m_UG\Y;?]}4s0O-U)uox>P3JN)9cm]O\@,vy2e{`3pb!"pqmRy3peB90*2L Mail-Copies-To: never In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of 30 Mar 1997 10:49:48 +0200 Original-Lines: 27 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.37/XEmacs 19.15 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10425 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10425 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > Scott Blachowicz writes: > > > I think I might have the nocem stuff enabled...would it be doing a > > bazillion separate connections for THAT? > > No, it's an, uhm, feature of how virtual servers are handled. For > some reason, Gnus believes that you have several (similar) virtual > servers, so you get these results. I have yet to come up with a fix. What about yet another layer of indirection. That is, something in nntp might use the same connection for two virtual servers to the same host/port. Although, I guess this doesn't work if they have different nntp-nov-is-evil settings or something. Isn't there a function to test if two virtual servers are the same? If so, does it not work in these cases for some reason? Or is it not being used at the right places? Or should such a thing be written? -- David Moore | Computer Systems Lab __o UCSD Dept. Computer Science - 0114 | Work: (619) 534-8604 _ \<,_ La Jolla, CA 92093-0114 | Fax: (619) 534-1445 (_)/ (_) | In a cloud bones of steel.