From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/10273 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Moore Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Should archive server add Message-IDs to the cache? Date: 18 Mar 1997 09:27:52 -0800 Sender: dmoore@sdnp5.ucsd.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.105) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035150171 23450 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:42:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:42:51 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id JAA18132 for ; Tue, 18 Mar 1997 09:44:08 -0800 Original-Received: from mailbox2.ucsd.edu (mailbox2.ucsd.edu [132.239.1.54]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Tue, 18 Mar 1997 18:26:00 +0100 Original-Received: from sdnp5.ucsd.edu (sdnp5.ucsd.edu [132.239.79.10]) by mailbox2.ucsd.edu (8.8.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id JAA29565 for ; Tue, 18 Mar 1997 09:25:52 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by sdnp5.ucsd.edu (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id JAA19032; Tue, 18 Mar 1997 09:27:52 -0800 Original-To: "(ding) Gnus Mailing List" X-Face: "oX;zS#-JU$-,WKSzG.1gGE]x^cIg!hW.dq>.f6pzS^A+(k!T|M:}5{_%>Io<>L&{hO7W4cicOQ|>/lZ1G(m%7iaCf,6Qgk0%%Bz7b2-W3jd0m_UG\Y;?]}4s0O-U)uox>P3JN)9cm]O\@,vy2e{`3pb!"pqmRy3peB90*2L Mail-Copies-To: never In-Reply-To: Kai Grossjohann's message of 18 Mar 1997 17:43:46 +0100 Original-Lines: 22 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.28/XEmacs 19.15(beta100) Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10273 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10273 Kai Grossjohann writes: > >>>>> David Moore writes: > > David> I don't think things in the Gcc line should be adding > David> Message-IDs to the cache. Especially not for my real archive > David> groups. It makes duplicate detection fairly useless for how > David> I sometimes arrange things. > > Only for those groups, I think. I always Gcc into the group I post > from which makes duplicate deletion a nice thing to have. No, it's global. And it has to be, since it has to know about the duplication before it's decided what group the message belongs in, since you want to be able to use the `Gnus-Warning: duplicate message...' header when filing your mail. -- David Moore | Computer Systems Lab __o UCSD Dept. Computer Science - 0114 | Work: (619) 534-8604 _ \<,_ La Jolla, CA 92093-0114 | Fax: (619) 534-1445 (_)/ (_) | In a cloud bones of steel.