From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/10269 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Moore Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Should archive server add Message-IDs to the cache? Date: 18 Mar 1997 08:33:07 -0800 Sender: dmoore@sdnp5.ucsd.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.105) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035150168 23432 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:42:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:42:48 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id IAA18044 for ; Tue, 18 Mar 1997 08:51:45 -0800 Original-Received: from mailbox2.ucsd.edu (mailbox2.ucsd.edu [132.239.1.54]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Tue, 18 Mar 1997 17:31:39 +0100 Original-Received: from sdnp5.ucsd.edu (sdnp5.ucsd.edu [132.239.79.10]) by mailbox2.ucsd.edu (8.8.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id IAA25590 for ; Tue, 18 Mar 1997 08:31:07 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by sdnp5.ucsd.edu (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id IAA18945; Tue, 18 Mar 1997 08:33:07 -0800 Original-To: "(ding) Gnus Mailing List" X-Face: "oX;zS#-JU$-,WKSzG.1gGE]x^cIg!hW.dq>.f6pzS^A+(k!T|M:}5{_%>Io<>L&{hO7W4cicOQ|>/lZ1G(m%7iaCf,6Qgk0%%Bz7b2-W3jd0m_UG\Y;?]}4s0O-U)uox>P3JN)9cm]O\@,vy2e{`3pb!"pqmRy3peB90*2L Mail-Copies-To: never In-Reply-To: Hans de Graaff's message of 18 Mar 1997 13:07:44 +0100 Original-Lines: 20 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.28/XEmacs 19.15(beta100) Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10269 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10269 Hans de Graaff writes: > In one of the recent Gnus versions Lars changed caching of > Message-IDs. As a side effect, the archive server (which is nnfolder > based in my setup) now also adds Message-IDs to the ID cache. > I have discussed this a bit with Lars, with my main end of the > argument being that the archive server should not add Message-IDs to > the cache of IDs. Lars suggested to bring it up on the list to see > what other people think. I don't think things in the Gcc line should be adding Message-IDs to the cache. Especially not for my real archive groups. It makes duplicate detection fairly useless for how I sometimes arrange things. -- David Moore | Computer Systems Lab __o UCSD Dept. Computer Science - 0114 | Work: (619) 534-8604 _ \<,_ La Jolla, CA 92093-0114 | Fax: (619) 534-1445 (_)/ (_) | In a cloud bones of steel.