From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/9239 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Moore Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: NoCeM flakiness in 0.74 and higher Date: 17 Dec 1996 14:35:19 -0800 Sender: dmoore@sdnp5.ucsd.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035149293 17261 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:28:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:28:13 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id OAA29486 for ; Tue, 17 Dec 1996 14:50:18 -0800 Original-Received: from UCSD.EDU (mailbox2.ucsd.edu [132.239.1.54]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Tue, 17 Dec 1996 23:37:06 +0100 Original-Received: from sdnp5.ucsd.edu (sdnp5.ucsd.edu [132.239.79.10]) by UCSD.EDU (8.8.3/8.6.9) with SMTP id OAA11307 for ; Tue, 17 Dec 1996 14:37:04 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by sdnp5.ucsd.edu (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id OAA08936; Tue, 17 Dec 1996 14:35:20 -0800 Original-To: The Ding List X-Face: "oX;zS#-JU$-,WKSzG.1gGE]x^cIg!hW.dq>.f6pzS^A+(k!T|M:}5{_%>Io<>L&{hO7W4cicOQ|>/lZ1G(m%7iaCf,6Qgk0%%Bz7b2-W3jd0m_UG\Y;?]}4s0O-U)uox>P3JN)9cm]O\@,vy2e{`3pb!"pqmRy3peB90*2L In-Reply-To: Sudish Joseph's message of 17 Dec 1996 16:13:13 -0500 Original-Lines: 28 X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.75/XEmacs 19.15 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9239 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9239 Sudish Joseph writes: > >> Here's where I stopped gnus: > >> Checking article 25608 in alt.nocem.misc for NoCeM... > >> Good signature from user "AutoMoose1 (Automated Cancelmoose)". > >> Verifying... > > > If it was stuck verifying, you could always (setq > > gnus-nocem-verifier nil). This is also substantially faster, at the > > cost that someone might forge a nocem posting. > > Oops, I should've been clearer. It isn't hanging--it's reading > articles that it's marked as read in NoCeM/active. The entry for > alt.nocem.misc in my orig post is ("alt.nocem.misc" (25378 . 26700)). > But it's verifying article 25608 above. Oh, interesting. I've not seen this happen and looking in the code in 0.74 can't really see where it might be happening. gnus-nocem-scan-groups should call gnus-retrieve-headers with 1+26700 to 26811 (the max active from nntp in this case). Maybe it's not loading your cache properly? Anyone else seeing something like this? -- David Moore | Computer Systems Lab __o UCSD Dept. Computer Science - 0114 | Work: (619) 534-8604 _ \<,_ La Jolla, CA 92093-0114 | Fax: (619) 534-1445 (_)/ (_) | In a cloud bones of steel.