From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/3980 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: konmsll@eua.ericsson.se (Mats Lidell) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Adaptive score and highlighting? Date: 15 Nov 1995 09:56:08 +0100 Organization: Objekt-Makarna AB, Kista, Sweden Sender: Mats.Lidell@eua.ericsson.se Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Content-Type: text X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035144792 28157 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:13:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:13:12 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by miranova.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with ESMTP id BAA20909 for ; Wed, 15 Nov 1995 01:57:36 -0800 Original-Received: from mailgate.ericsson.se (mailgate.ericsson.se [130.100.2.2]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Wed, 15 Nov 1995 09:56:23 +0100 Original-Received: from eua.ericsson.se (eua.ericsson.se [134.138.132.16]) by mailgate.ericsson.se (8.6.11/1.0) with SMTP id JAA02381 for ; Wed, 15 Nov 1995 09:56:20 +0100 Original-Received: from ms.eua.ericsson.se by eua.ericsson.se (4.1/EUA-2.1) id AA15690; Wed, 15 Nov 95 09:56:13 +0100 Original-Received: from euax3i4c24.eua.ericsson.se by ms.eua.ericsson.se (4.1/MS-2.1) id AA29838; Wed, 15 Nov 95 09:56:11 +0100 Original-Received: by euax3i4c24.eua.ericsson.se (5.x/client-1.3) id AA08220; Wed, 15 Nov 1995 09:56:10 +0100 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no Comments: Hyperbole mail buttons accepted, v04.01. In-Reply-To: konrrg@euax3i0c02.eua.ericsson.se's message of 13 Nov 1995 14:16:08 GMT Original-Lines: 18 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:3980 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:3980 Hi, I'm using the default adaption rules and I then get authors highlighted if I just read them once (!?) Or they are "lowered" if just a score of "-1" is attached to them. I dont' like this. Is there some way to get "highlight" when above some score (say 10) and "dimmed" when lower another score (say -10) so that small random changes won't trigger highlighting. I think there is a general problem also involved with this type of mechanism. Authors that once get "highlighted" will get their score increased because you must read him again because he is highlighted. I guess there is no solution to this other than to remove his score when you find out that this author doens't deserve that score. But then how do you do that in a controlled maner. Lower on author? %% Mats