From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/16174
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Dave Love <d.love@dl.ac.uk>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Not a timetable
Date: 22 Aug 1998 13:24:43 +0100
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <rzqd89tcigk.fsf@djlvig.dl.ac.uk>
References: <m3u33h6cwu.fsf@sparky.gnus.org> <x7r9ykaea2.fsf@peorth.gweep.net> <oqr9yk3bva.fsf@icule.progiciels-bpi.ca> <x7hfzgv8is.fsf@peorth.gweep.net> <873eaz4yov.fsf@slowfox.do.uunet.de> <x7pve3e2md.fsf@peorth.gweep.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035155086 26233 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:04:46 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:04:46 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from gwyn.tux.org (gwyn.tux.org [207.96.122.8])
	by altair.xemacs.org (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id FAA02989
	for <steve@altair.xemacs.org>; Sat, 22 Aug 1998 05:23:43 -0700
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5])
	by gwyn.tux.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA06185
	for <steve@xemacs.org>; Sat, 22 Aug 1998 08:25:10 -0400
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id HAK15502; Sat, 22 Aug 1998 07:25:09 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sat, 22 Aug 1998 07:24:51 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [209.195.19.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id HAA15489 for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Sat, 22 Aug 1998 07:24:43 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from djlvig.dl.ac.uk (djlvig.dl.ac.uk [148.79.112.146])
	by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id IAA04681
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Sat, 22 Aug 1998 08:24:38 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: (from fx@localhost)
	by djlvig.dl.ac.uk (8.8.7/8.8.5) id NAA03658;
	Sat, 22 Aug 1998 13:24:43 +0100
X-Face: "_!nmR@11ZNuumt0oqG"Y3Hfy|;FGz)`"ul[G?ah6k-oNyDW?3/Nq3Qab$kUnUQ_d4};kPl
 R=}-Vqfo|S5mThi-k<sb8dDL76.\(='H$ee]<E5E=}pX[X&;]RITcPw-6GDeIlbJlshHd~p1Ip&xZE
 [dYv$`;'AXF-OV$@6dcl/*rvO{8a~`_Qq2FJZx>aBR=>%g5a3-OvnEhdHu{^APIaP:b}0m!$bDC>SX
 zz'r)e?`at?tpD*+~b+pf
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
In-Reply-To: Stainless Steel Rat's message of "Fri, 14 Aug 1998 20:23:13 GMT"
Original-Lines: 20
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.6.38/Emacs 20.2
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:16174
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:16174

>>>>> "Rat" == Stainless Steel Rat <ratinox@peorth.gweep.net> writes:

 Rat> C-d and C-u are not 25-50% of the footprint of vi.

Without wishing to defend MULE, I doubt it represents that fraction of
Emacs 20.3's footprint.

 KG> I think removing all features you don't use from all programs you
 KG> use is going to be a lot of work.

 Rat> I can do it with XEmacs 19 and 20 with autoconf switches.  I can
 Rat> do it with Emacs 19 with autoconf switches.  I can do it with
 Rat> Emacs 20 with autoconf switches, with the exception of MULE.
 Rat> 'nuff said, I think.

You use all the features of Emacs 20.3 apart from MULE, X and POP
variants?  Gosh.

-- 
Mercifully Unibyte's Largely Effective