From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/15307 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dave Love Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Cool bug in URL parsing Date: Thu, 11 Jun 1998 17:34:06 GMT Organization: Daresbury Laboratory, Warrington WA4 4AD, UK Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035154363 21401 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 22:52:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 22:52:43 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from gwyn.tux.org (gwyn.tux.org [207.96.122.8]) by altair.xemacs.org (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id KAA13747 for ; Thu, 11 Jun 1998 10:41:47 -0700 Original-Received: from gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (gizmo.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.102.31]) by gwyn.tux.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA30970 for ; Thu, 11 Jun 1998 13:38:14 -0400 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (sina.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.3.5]) by gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id MAS20201; Thu, 11 Jun 1998 12:10:46 -0500 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Thu, 11 Jun 1998 12:35:07 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from claymore.vcinet.com (claymore.vcinet.com [208.205.12.23]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id MAA29161 for ; Thu, 11 Jun 1998 12:34:55 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: (qmail 7833 invoked by uid 504); 11 Jun 1998 17:34:14 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 7830 invoked from network); 11 Jun 1998 17:34:13 -0000 Original-Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by claymore.vcinet.com with SMTP; 11 Jun 1998 17:34:13 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 24939 invoked by uid 509); 11 Jun 1998 17:34:07 -0000 Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Path: not-for-mail X-Face: >HIY2ER>M+v]&Dgt^n418Sf==2-~.\9n\6U^?;52>7M;HDHoOvP6._`^KN6yx7nh;hlz>m< HU=/v;c&,@]1?x{k4Qx,#l0Wk=*!KcNdk!r@*RD%"w/9>{Qc5yT:o7+]x+;gEf"0F>>>> "Hrvoje" == Hrvoje Niksic writes: Hrvoje> Dave Love writes: >> Is it really necessary to do (more-or-less slow) buttonizing >> etc. automatically for the whole of a big message rather than >> restricting it to sensible-sized regions at the top and bottom where >> the relevant stuff is likely to be? Hrvoje> I believe it is necessary to scan the whole message. I wasn't proposing either preventing you doing so explicitly or setting the limits arbitrarily large. Hrvoje> The whole point is to have, for instance, clickable URLs Hrvoje> anywhere in the message, even if it is a long FAQ. Not for me. I too am happy generally with, in my case, Emacs' lazy-lock but doubt such complication is merited here. .