From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/38489
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Dave Love <d.love@dl.ac.uk>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Gnus MIME support and rmail
Date: 01 Sep 2001 17:39:35 +0100
Sender: Dave Love <fx@dl.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <rzqitf2zwzc.fsf@djlvig.dl.ac.uk>
References: <200108230303.XAA00443@europa.research.att.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035174344 22688 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:25:44 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:25:44 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: ding@gnus.org
Return-Path: <fx@dl.ac.uk>
Return-Path: <fx@dl.ac.uk>
Original-Received: (qmail 18167 invoked from network); 1 Sep 2001 16:39:38 -0000
Original-Received: from djlvig.dl.ac.uk (148.79.112.146)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 1 Sep 2001 16:39:38 -0000
Original-Received: from fx by djlvig.dl.ac.uk with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 15dDnz-0003Rs-00; Sat, 01 Sep 2001 17:39:35 +0100
X-Face: "_!nmR@11ZNuumt0oqG"Y3Hfy|;FGz)`"ul[G?ah6k-oNyDW?3/Nq3Qab$kUnUQ_d4};kPl
 R=}-Vqfo|S5mThi-k<sb8dDL76.\(='H$ee]<E5E=}pX[X&;]RITcPw-6GDeIlbJlshHd~p1Ip&xZE
 [dYv$`;'AXF-OV$@6dcl/*rvO{8a~`_Qq2FJZx>aBR=>%g5a3-OvnEhdHu{^APIaP:b}0m!$bDC>SX
 zz'r)e?`at?tpD*+~b+pf
Original-To: Andrew Koenig <ark-mlist@research.att.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.0.106
Original-Lines: 16
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38489
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38489

>>>>> "AK" == Andrew Koenig <ark-mlist@research.att.com> writes:

 AK> Are there any plans to integrate the Gnus MIME support with
 AK> RMAIL?  

There were, but the MIME library wasn't clean enough to do so when I
installed Gnus 5.9 in Emacs.  I worked somewhat on cleaning it up when
I installed it in Emacs, but the implication of a previous exchange
here was that it was no longer policy to maintain it for such a task,
and I dropped the work.

 AK> Or is RMAIL considered obsolescent at this point?

No.  It had plenty of features added during the feature freeze,
specifically for use with SEMI (or whatever it's called these days)
since that was the only option.