From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/46208 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dave Love Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Gnus changes in Emacs-Unicode branch Date: 21 Aug 2002 17:47:16 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1029948465 3111 127.0.0.1 (21 Aug 2002 16:47:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 16:47:45 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17hYe0-0000o3-00 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 18:47:44 +0200 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 17hYds-0005l1-00; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 11:47:36 -0500 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Wed, 21 Aug 2002 11:48:06 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA29040 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 11:47:55 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: (qmail 10458 invoked by alias); 21 Aug 2002 16:47:19 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 10453 invoked from network); 21 Aug 2002 16:47:18 -0000 Original-Received: from albion.dl.ac.uk (148.79.80.39) by gnus.org with SMTP; 21 Aug 2002 16:47:18 -0000 Original-Received: from fx by albion.dl.ac.uk with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17hYdY-0005Ml-00 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 17:47:16 +0100 Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 21 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:46208 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:46208 Simon Josefsson writes: > USEFOR says to use UTF-8, so Gnus tries to decode group names as > UTF-8. OK, then there should be no issue in Emacs 21 iff the unicodes are representable. Otherwise (for most of the CJK space and anything outside the BMP) the byte sequences will be maintained as eight-bit chars, which may or mat not be a problem. > Err, OK, I thought this was related to the Emacs Unicode branch > only. That's all I've touched. I just qualified what I said about implementation to exclude XEmacs. > If the patch is against Oort and todays' (X)Emacs, and FWIW, I'd vote > for simply installing it. There is no patch as far as I know. As I said, what I did hasn't been finished or properly tested.