From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/52245 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dave Love Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: rfc2047 patch broke Gnus on XEmacsc Date: 04 May 2003 12:20:11 +0100 Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <87u1ccnyi6.fsf@orebokech.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1052070676 22346 80.91.224.249 (4 May 2003 17:51:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 4 May 2003 17:51:16 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M788@lists.math.uh.edu Sun May 04 19:51:14 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19CNdp-0005o1-00 for ; Sun, 04 May 2003 19:51:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 19CNf0-0007wK-00; Sun, 04 May 2003 12:52:26 -0500 Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com ([64.157.176.121]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 19CHXR-0004Yx-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 04 May 2003 06:20:13 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 48174 invoked by alias); 4 May 2003 11:20:13 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 48169 invoked from network); 4 May 2003 11:20:12 -0000 Original-Received: from albion.dl.ac.uk (148.79.80.39) by sclp3.sclp.com with SMTP; 4 May 2003 11:20:12 -0000 Original-Received: from fx by albion.dl.ac.uk with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 19CHXQ-0006w5-00 for ; Sun, 04 May 2003 12:20:12 +0100 Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 10 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:52245 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:52245 Romain FRANCOISE writes: > I'm wondering if Dave's changes really apply as "bugfixes only", It's clearly a bug to send badly-encoded messages. MTAs even bounce them, which is why I went to the trouble to fix it. I'm also trying to get it into a better state for inclusion in Emacs, allow using the components separately, and merge changes which are in the Emacs sources. The mess around Gnus 5.9 shouldn't be repeated.