5.6.41

5.6.41

[Hrvoje Niksic]

YES!  Multiple x-faces work again!  :-)

-- 
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
By any chance, have you seen a summoned 9th order fire elemental
wandering around?  No?  Oh..  Tell me if you do.

Re: 5.6.41

[Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen]

Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> writes:

> YES!  Multiple x-faces work again!  :-)

One other thing -- could everyone test the `^' summary buffer command
to see whether it still works (and let know know if it doesn't)?  I
changed the recalculation function from being n^2 to n, which, like,
is a quite significant improvent in large summaries.  :-)

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen

Re: 5.6.41

[Didier Verna]

Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> writes:

> YES!  Multiple x-faces work again!  :-)

	What's the problem with Emacs and multiple X-Faces ?

Re: 5.6.41

[Hrvoje Niksic]

Didier Verna <verna@inf.enst.fr> writes:

> Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> writes:
> 
> > YES!  Multiple x-faces work again!  :-)
> 
> 	What's the problem with Emacs and multiple X-Faces ?

I think FSF Emacs shows x-faces by piping their output to xv, and it
didn't work correctly.  I got to not see your face, so I filed a bug
report.

-- 
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
Thou Who might be our Father Who perhaps may be in Heaven...
                                                -- Roger Zelazny

Re: 5.6.41

[Phil Humpherys]

I don't use Xemacs, just regular emacs (20.3).  Is it difficult
to see X-faces with this setup?

--
Phil Humpherys <phumpherys@utah-inter.net>   DriverSoft
Unix Systems Administrator                   Mobile: +1.801.725.3257 
WWW/PGPkeys: http://www.spire.com/~humphery



Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> writes:

> Didier Verna <verna@inf.enst.fr> writes:
> 
> > Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> writes:
> > 
> > > YES!  Multiple x-faces work again!  :-)
> > 
> > 	What's the problem with Emacs and multiple X-Faces ?
> 
> I think FSF Emacs shows x-faces by piping their output to xv, and it
> didn't work correctly.  I got to not see your face, so I filed a bug
> report.
> 
> -- 
> Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
> --------------------------------+--------------------------------
> Thou Who might be our Father Who perhaps may be in Heaven...
>                                                 -- Roger Zelazny

Re: 5.6.41

[Lars Balker Rasmussen]

Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> writes:
> Didier Verna <verna@inf.enst.fr> writes:
> > 	What's the problem with Emacs and multiple X-Faces ?
> 
> I think FSF Emacs shows x-faces by piping their output to xv, and it
> didn't work correctly.  I got to not see your face, so I filed a bug
> report.

Well, I suppose it beats filing a bug report upon seeing his face.

Summary ^ works great for me in 5.6.41.  Good work, Lars.
-- 
Lars Balker Rasmussen, Software Engineer, Mjolner Informatics ApS
lbr@mjolner.dk

Re: 5.6.41

[Dave Love]

>>>>> "dv" == Didier Verna <verna@inf.enst.fr> writes:

 dv> 	What's the problem with Emacs and multiple X-Faces ?

The worst was that two-faced people could crash some versions of Emacs
-- see comments in the source.  (Fixed in 20.3.)  That seemed a good
excuse to discourage multifaceted behaviour.