From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/52892 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dave Love Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: RFC-2047 vs. INN Compatibility Issue Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 18:27:25 +0100 Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <20030524155517.GA24987@merlin.emma.line.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1054142766 12122 80.91.224.249 (28 May 2003 17:26:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 17:26:06 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M1436@lists.math.uh.edu Wed May 28 19:26:02 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19L4gc-00038v-00 for ; Wed, 28 May 2003 19:26:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 19L4i9-0003KK-00; Wed, 28 May 2003 12:27:37 -0500 Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com ([64.157.176.121]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 19L4i0-0003KC-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 28 May 2003 12:27:28 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 51000 invoked by alias); 28 May 2003 17:27:28 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 50995 invoked from network); 28 May 2003 17:27:28 -0000 Original-Received: from albion.dl.ac.uk (148.79.80.39) by sclp3.sclp.com with SMTP; 28 May 2003 17:27:28 -0000 Original-Received: from fx by albion.dl.ac.uk with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 19L4hx-0005Of-00 for ; Wed, 28 May 2003 18:27:25 +0100 Original-To: ding@gnus.org User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:52892 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:52892 Matthias Andree writes: > particularly the Re: should never be part of an encoded string. Rationale: > non-MIME-Aware readers will duplicate the Re: if it's encoded like > this. That's a good point. I'll change it. Note that the CVS version has a fix which should avoid the break after `Subject:'.