From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/15297
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Dave Love <d.love@dl.ac.uk>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Cool bug in URL parsing
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 1998 18:42:29 GMT
Organization: Daresbury Laboratory, Warrington WA4 4AD, UK
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <rzqvhqflmge.fsf@djlvig.dl.ac.uk>
References: <vxkd8dqcdss.fsf@pocari-sweat.jprc.com> <rj67jioyor.fsf@zuse.+dina.kvl.dk> <kigwwby6p1x.fsf@jagor.srce.hr> <m33edpolqy.fsf@sparky.gnus.org> <kigd8csb9nf.fsf@jagor.srce.hr> <m3wwazji7f.fsf@sparky.gnus.org> <kigsolmsopd.fsf@jagor.srce.hr> <m3btsajad9.fsf@sparky.gnus.org> <kigogwam223.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035154355 21352 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 22:52:35 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 22:52:35 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from gwyn.tux.org (gwyn.tux.org [207.96.122.8])
	by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA20174
	for <steve@altair.xemacs.org>; Fri, 5 Jun 1998 11:52:03 -0700
Original-Received: from gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (gizmo.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.102.31])
	by gwyn.tux.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA14752
	for <steve@xemacs.org>; Fri, 5 Jun 1998 14:48:53 -0400
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (sina.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.3.5]) by gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAS27399; Fri, 5 Jun 1998 13:18:43 -0500
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Fri, 05 Jun 1998 13:43:09 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from claymore.vcinet.com (claymore.vcinet.com [208.205.12.23]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA02352 for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Fri, 5 Jun 1998 13:42:57 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: (qmail 1027 invoked by uid 504); 5 Jun 1998 18:42:36 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 1024 invoked from network); 5 Jun 1998 18:42:36 -0000
Original-Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30)
  by claymore.vcinet.com with SMTP; 5 Jun 1998 18:42:35 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 24250 invoked by uid 509); 5 Jun 1998 18:42:30 -0000
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
Original-Path: not-for-mail
X-Face: >HIY2ER>M+v]&Dgt^n418Sf==2-~.\9n\6U^?;52>7M;HDHoOvP6._`^KN6yx7nh;hlz>m<
 HU=/v;c&,@]1?x{k4Qx,#l0Wk=*!KcNdk!r@*RD%"w/9>{Qc5yT:o7+]x+;gEf"0F<g\I:eDTl`faI
 *a97}bnUrWgT2_s8`C/M*|R%1*Q:Ovt""*q`WnRx`XWK]"YDSG+
Original-Newsgroups: emacs.ding
X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.6.11/Emacs 20.2
Original-Lines: 4
Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: djlvig.dl.ac.uk
Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 05 Jun 1998 20:42:29 MET DST
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:15297
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:15297


Is it really necessary to do (more-or-less slow) buttonizing
etc. automatically for the whole of a big message rather than
restricting it to sensible-sized regions at the top and bottom where
the relevant stuff is likely to be?
.