From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/16248
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Dave Love <d.love@dl.ac.uk>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Not a timetable
Date: 24 Aug 1998 23:31:22 +0100
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <rzqww7yqaf9.fsf@djlvig.dl.ac.uk>
References: <m3u33h6cwu.fsf@sparky.gnus.org> <x7r9ykaea2.fsf@peorth.gweep.net> <oqr9yk3bva.fsf@icule.progiciels-bpi.ca> <x7hfzgv8is.fsf@peorth.gweep.net> <873eaz4yov.fsf@slowfox.do.uunet.de> <x7pve3e2md.fsf@peorth.gweep.net> <rzqd89tcigk.fsf@djlvig.dl.ac.uk> <x7d89rrg0f.fsf@peorth.gweep.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035155146 26595 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:05:46 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:05:46 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from gwyn.tux.org (gwyn.tux.org [207.96.122.8])
	by altair.xemacs.org (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA27480
	for <steve@altair.xemacs.org>; Mon, 24 Aug 1998 15:31:16 -0700
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5])
	by gwyn.tux.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA29686
	for <steve@xemacs.org>; Mon, 24 Aug 1998 18:32:34 -0400
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAK27556; Mon, 24 Aug 1998 17:32:23 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Mon, 24 Aug 1998 17:31:51 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [209.195.19.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA27542 for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Mon, 24 Aug 1998 17:31:33 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from djlvig.dl.ac.uk (djlvig.dl.ac.uk [148.79.112.146])
	by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA17872
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Mon, 24 Aug 1998 18:31:28 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: (from fx@localhost)
	by djlvig.dl.ac.uk (8.8.7/8.8.5) id XAA26795;
	Mon, 24 Aug 1998 23:31:24 +0100
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
In-Reply-To: Stainless Steel Rat's message of "Sun, 23 Aug 1998 13:23:13 GMT"
Original-Lines: 20
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.6.39/Emacs 20.3
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:16248
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:16248

>>>>> "Rat" == Stainless Steel Rat <ratinox@peorth.gweep.net> writes:

 Rat> The Emacs 20.1 and 20.1 binaries are ~50% larger than the Emacs 19.34
 Rat> binary (Linux/GNU system, GCC 2.7.2).  The memory footprint is comesurately
 Rat> larger.  Most of that code increase is MULE.

 KG> I think removing all features you don't use from all programs you
 KG> use is going to be a lot of work.

 Rat> Only becaue RMS decided to break his own "rules" and incorporated MULE in a
 Rat> fashion that prevents it from being removed.  He could have done it right,
 Rat> witness XEmacs which has MULE as a compile time feature.  He decided not to
 Rat> do it that way.

 Rat> [...]

 DL> You use all the features of Emacs 20.3 apart from MULE, X and POP
 DL> variants?  Gosh.

 Rat> I don't use FSF Emacs 20.anything since I cannot build it without MULE.