From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/62644 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dave Love Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: use of (defvar ) Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 17:45:27 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87lkuhdsyb.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <85vetij18o.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1144773957 17075 80.91.229.2 (11 Apr 2006 16:45:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 16:45:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stefan Monnier , ding@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 11 18:45:55 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FTM01-0007Pv-8A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2006 18:45:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FTM00-0003zP-Ob for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2006 12:45:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FTLzm-0003un-GR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2006 12:45:38 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FTLzk-0003qK-9L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2006 12:45:37 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FTLzk-0003q6-0k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2006 12:45:36 -0400 Original-Received: from [217.158.120.143] (helo=mail.ukfsn.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FTM4Y-0007wJ-4C; Tue, 11 Apr 2006 12:50:34 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (84-45-211-153.no-dns-yet.enta.net [84.45.211.153]) by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C766DE6F7E; Tue, 11 Apr 2006 17:42:07 +0100 (BST) Original-Received: from fx by localhost with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FTLzb-0002UJ-DV; Tue, 11 Apr 2006 17:45:27 +0100 Original-To: David Kastrup X-Draft-From: ("nnml:Misc" 413) User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:52686 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:62644 Archived-At: David Kastrup writes: > Unloading features is so unreliable in Emacs 21 that there is little > point in accommodating it. Actually doing the work (when it was possible to help) obviously gave me a different perspective. I realize it's not relevant, though.