From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/6611 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: morioka@jaist.ac.jp (=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCPGkyLBsoQiAbJEJDTkknGyhC?= / MORIOKA Tomohiko) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: [Gnus 5.2.14] message-make-sender Date: 11 Jun 1996 01:06:11 +0900 Organization: JAIST, Hokuriku / =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCS0xOJkBoQzwySjNYGyhC?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCNTs9UUJnM1gxIUJnM1gbKEI=?= Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 (SEMI mime-edit 0.25) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035147041 4193 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:50:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:50:41 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id JAA16128 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 1996 09:28:24 -0700 Original-Received: from mikan.jaist.ac.jp (mikan.jaist.ac.jp [150.65.8.6]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Mon, 10 Jun 1996 18:06:21 +0200 Original-Received: from is28e1s91.jaist.ac.jp (MORIOKA Tomohiko ) by mikan.jaist.ac.jp (8.7.5); id BAA22353; Tue, 11 Jun 1996 01:06:13 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by is28e1s91.jaist.ac.jp (4.1/JE-C); Tue, 11 Jun 96 01:06:12 JST Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no X-Emacs: Mule 2.3 =?ISO-2022-JP?B?KBskQkt2RSYyVhsoQik=?= based on 19.31 Dcc: morioka X-Mua: tm-mh-e 7.63, tm-view 7.65 In-Reply-To: Richard Pieri's message of 10 Jun 1996 10:14:23 -0400 Original-Lines: 66 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.2.14/Emacs 19.31 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6611 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6611 >>>>> In >>>>> Richard Pieri wrote: Richard> >>>>> "aj" == =?ISO-2022-JP?Q?=1B$B >>>>> writes: aj> Sender field must include a mail reachable real address. Richard> Nope. From RFC822: (snip) Richard> [For instance, a mailing list manager will set the Sender: Richard> field because it is responsible for sending messages but it Richard> does not originate messages. --Rat] (snip) Richard> The Sender mailbox specification includes a word Richard> sequence which must correspond to a specific agent Richard> (i.e., a human user or a computer program) rather Richard> than a standard address. This indicates the Richard> expectation that the field will identify the single Richard> agent (person, system, or process) responsible for Richard> sending the mail and not simply include the name of a Richard> mailbox from which the mail was sent. For example in Richard> the case of a shared login name, the name, by itself, Richard> would not be adequate. The local-part address unit, Richard> which refers to this agent, is expected to be a Richard> computer system term, and not (for example) a Richard> generalized person reference which can be used Richard> outside the network text message context. Richard> [In fact, not only does Sender: not need to contain a valid Richard> Internet mail address, it generally should not contain Richard> one. --Rat] Thanks for your kind answer. Please confirm again. In my Emacs, (system-name) returns "is28e1s91", so message.el adds Sender: morioka@is28e1s91 Of course, it is not valid mail address. I think Sender field is to identify the agent responsible for sending message, and it seems not enough to identify the agent. By the way, (system-name) should return FQDM? Richard> No, that is the Reply-To: header. My from field is valid, so I does have such kind of problem. My question is Sender: morioka@is28e1s91 is valid or not. Thanks, -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Morioka Tomohiko (`Morioka' is my family name, `Tomohiko' is my personal name.) ---------------- I protest continuation of Chinese nuclear testing.---