From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/28085
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: patl@cag.lcs.mit.edu (Patrick J. LoPresti)
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Fully-qualifying Email addresses in outgoing mail
Date: 10 Dec 1999 15:25:37 -0500
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <s5gr9guilvi.fsf@egghead.curl.com>
References: <s5g4sdrye91.fsf@egghead.curl.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035164994 27980 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 01:49:54 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 01:49:54 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from bart.math.uh.edu (bart.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.48])
	by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA27687
	for <jason@mailhost.sclp.com>; Fri, 10 Dec 1999 15:26:37 -0500 (EST)
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5])
	by bart.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAB09818;
	Fri, 10 Dec 1999 14:26:30 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Fri, 10 Dec 1999 14:26:37 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139])
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA16450
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Fri, 10 Dec 1999 14:26:28 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from egghead.curl.com ([216.230.79.4])
	by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id PAA27680
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Fri, 10 Dec 1999 15:26:06 -0500 (EST)
Original-Received: (qmail 6873 invoked by uid 10171); 10 Dec 1999 15:25:37 -0500
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
In-Reply-To: patl@cag.lcs.mit.edu's message of "09 Dec 1999 16:52:41 -0500"
Original-Lines: 12
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.4
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:28085
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:28085

I guess I get to answer my own question.

>>From the qmail FAQ, in response to the question "How do I fix up
messages from dumb clients?", there is a procedure for configuring
qmail-smtpd to do the same broken header-rewriting that sendmail does:
  
  http://cr.yp.to/qmail/faq/servers.html#network-rewriting

So I guess message-mode/smtpmail can stay just as broken as other SMTP
clients.

 - Pat