From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/28100 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: patl@cag.lcs.mit.edu (Patrick J. LoPresti) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Fully-qualifying Email addresses in outgoing mail Date: 10 Dec 1999 20:28:12 -0500 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035165008 28107 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 01:50:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 01:50:08 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from bart.math.uh.edu (bart.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.48]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA01212 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 1999 20:29:12 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by bart.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAB26164; Fri, 10 Dec 1999 19:29:07 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Fri, 10 Dec 1999 19:29:12 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA19047 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 1999 19:29:03 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from egghead.curl.com ([216.230.79.4]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id UAA01206 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 1999 20:28:41 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (qmail 7877 invoked by uid 10171); 10 Dec 1999 20:28:12 -0500 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Stainless Steel Rat's message of "10 Dec 1999 17:31:18 -0500" Original-Lines: 22 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.4 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:28100 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:28100 Stainless Steel Rat writes: > * Russ Allbery on Fri, 10 Dec 1999 > | Um... sendmail even rewrites To and Cc headers it gets via SMTP. > | sendmail is horribly broken in this regard. > Hmmm... I'll be damned, and you are right on both counts. Well, v8 > sendmail does, anyway. I do not have immediate access to a v5 > sendmail to compare. Of course he's right, because he restated what I have said from the beginning. sendmail has always been broken like this. And now that Outlook and Netscape and Eudora and MH and every other piece-of-sh** MUA are broken in a complementary way, every MTA ever written until the end of time will need to be similarly broken. I was thinking maybe Emacs+message-mode+smtpmail could provide a non-broken MUA, but what would be the point, really, I guess. - Pat