From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/35170 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Toby Speight Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Thoughts on Message-ID generation Date: 02 Mar 2001 14:35:32 +0000 Organization: Citrix Systems Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <87n1b6rcq9.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> <3A9EC79F.9CB38BEA@home.com> <01Mar1.174128est.115320@gateway.intersys.com> <3A9ED357.268858BD@home.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035170958 1571 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:29:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:29:18 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from lisa.math.uh.edu (lisa.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.49]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D4A8D049E for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2001 09:38:35 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by lisa.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id IAB13952; Fri, 2 Mar 2001 08:38:29 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Fri, 02 Mar 2001 08:35:24 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@66-209.196.61.interliant.com [209.196.61.66] (may be forged)) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA10572 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2001 08:35:13 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from gatekeeper.ctxuk.citrix.com (gatekeeper.ctxuk.citrix.com [195.153.38.114]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4495CD049E for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2001 09:35:40 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sh.ctxuk.citrix.com (sh.ctxuk.citrix.com [10.30.224.4]) by gatekeeper.ctxuk.citrix.com (8.8.7/BSCF-1.7) with ESMTP id OAA17728 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2001 14:35:39 GMT Original-Received: from hwvwall01.ctxuk.citrix.com (hwvwall01.ctxuk.citrix.com [10.30.224.27]) by sh.ctxuk.citrix.com (8.8.7/BSCF-1.7) with SMTP id OAA16341 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2001 14:35:38 GMT Original-Received: from 10.30.224.101 by hwvwall01.ctxuk.citrix.com (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Fri, 02 Mar 2001 14:34:50 -0000 (GMT Standard Time) Original-Received: by hwexch01.ctxuk.citrix.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Fri, 2 Mar 2001 14:35:37 -0000 Original-Received: from lanber.cam.eu.citrix.com ([10.70.128.81]) by hwexch01.ctxuk.citrix.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21) id G1SKGS78; Fri, 2 Mar 2001 14:35:33 -0000 Original-To: The Gnus Mailing List User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.7 X-Face: wqk-$Z5Z In article , 0> Stainless Steel Rat ("Rat") wrote: Rat> The fully-qualified domain name of a host is required to be Rat> unique. If it is not then the host is misconfigured. Only for Internet-connected systems. I'm not convinced that the above is true for indirectly accessible hosts on a (e.g.) NAT network with a private internal DNS. Isn't there a reserved domain for private naming analogous to 10.* IP numbers?