From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/36006 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Toby Speight Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: multipart/alternative bug? Date: 25 Apr 2001 11:27:09 +0100 Sender: tspeight@lanber.cam.eu.citrix.com Message-ID: References: <3AE5D49F.40A74F9F@HatterasOnMyMind.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035171666 6307 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:41:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:41:06 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 14686 invoked by alias); 25 Apr 2001 10:27:35 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 14681 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2001 10:27:32 -0000 Original-Received: from gatekeeper.ctxuk.citrix.com (root@195.153.38.114) by gnus.org with SMTP; 25 Apr 2001 10:27:32 -0000 Original-Received: from sh.ctxuk.citrix.com (sh.ctxuk.citrix.com [10.30.224.4]) by gatekeeper.ctxuk.citrix.com (8.8.7/BSCF-1.7) with ESMTP id LAA15881 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2001 11:27:16 +0100 (BST) Original-Received: from uk1mailscan01 (uk1mailscan01.ctxuk.citrix.com [10.30.224.37]) by sh.ctxuk.citrix.com (8.8.7/BSCF-1.7) with SMTP id LAA26429 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2001 11:27:12 +0100 (BST) Original-Received: from 10.30.224.104 by uk1mailscan01 (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Wed, 25 Apr 2001 11:27:12 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time) Original-Received: from lanber.cam.eu.citrix.com ([10.70.128.81]) by hwmail04.ctxuk.citrix.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21) id JJS3T22N; Wed, 25 Apr 2001 11:27:10 +0100 Original-To: The Gnus Mailing List In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 Original-Lines: 48 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36006 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36006 0> In article , 0> Toby Speight ("Toby") wrote: Toby> Why does this not display properly for me? (I'm not particularly bothered about seeing this spam, but I'm concerned about genuine mails...) I see the message as if it were a multipart/mixed containing one text/plain part, beginning with Anon> --------------27BEBD72CFE816D2DAE0A30E Anon> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Anon> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit and ending with Anon> FVRWi3+FfkcUWqD0q7BfppgKVRHQdEX37jAWUSVs0iUAMSjwIP8AzVkAG0lCFo+4rloaFh9I+Awr Anon> axvT9q4UbrRSvw9fbFFLw0nEih4nvTFX/9k= Anon> Anon> --------------329329E610BEF8140BC1E45B-- Anon> Anon> --------------27BEBD72CFE816D2DAE0A30E-- If I C-d on the article, I get the right structure: > R +[ HatterasOnMyMind co: 492 ] <* mixed> Virtual Vacations!!! ... from HatterasOnMyMind.com > R + [ HatterasOnMyMind co: 486 ] <1.* alternative> > R + [ HatterasOnMyMind co: 463 ] <1.2.* related> > + [ HatterasOnMyMind co: 20 ] <1.2.1 html> > R + [ HatterasOnMyMind co: 430 ] <1.2.2 jpeg> > R + [ HatterasOnMyMin d! ! co: 13 ] <1.1 text> Selecting the <1.* alternative> part gives me the raw message text, but anything deeper than that works correctly. Is it something to do with the InterScan_NT filter used by our mail gateway? (Perhaps the ^M at the end of the "Content-Type: multipart/alternative" header). Or is it a Gnus bug (5.8.8 on Emacs 20.7, from Debian "testing" distribution)? Here's the message as it arrived here, after being mangled by the gateway (I've truncated the image data to reduce message size - but that's not relevant here). I'm not sure why that all got folded onto one line - I'm obviously having problems with 5.8.8! I'll try this again: Why does this not display properly for me? (I'm not particularly bothered about seeing this spam, but I'm concerned about genuine mails...) I see the message as if it were a multipart/mixed containing one text/plain part, beginning with Anon> --------------27BEBD72CFE816D2DAE0A30E Anon> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Anon> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit and ending with Anon> FVRWi3+FfkcUWqD0q7BfppgKVRHQdEX37jAWUSVs0iUAMSjwIP8AzVkAG0lCFo+4rloaFh9I+Awr Anon> axvT9q4UbrRSvw9fbFFLw0nEih4nvTFX/9k= Anon> Anon> --------------329329E610BEF8140BC1E45B-- Anon> Anon> --------------27BEBD72CFE816D2DAE0A30E-- If I C-d on the article, I get the right structure: > R +[ HatterasOnMyMind co: 492 ] <* mixed> Virtual Vacations!!! ... from HatterasOnMyMind.com > + [ HatterasOnMyMind co: 486 ] <1.* alternative> > + [ HatterasOnMyMind co: 463 ] <1.2.* related> > + [ HatterasOnMyMind co: 20 ] <1.2.1 html> > + [ HatterasOnMyMind co: 430 ] <1.2.2 jpeg> > + [ HatterasOnMyMind co: 13 ] <1.1 text> Selecting the <1.* alternative> part gives me the raw message text, but anything deeper than that works correctly. Is it something to do with the InterScan_NT filter used by our mail gateway? (Perhaps the ^M at the end of the "Content-Type: multipart/alternative" header). Or is it a Gnus bug (5.8.8 on Emacs 20.7, from Debian "testing" distribution)? Here's the message as it arrived here, after being mangled by the gateway (I've truncated the image data to reduce message size - but that's not relevant here).