From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/72685 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Julien Danjou Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: 'g' transfers a lot of data Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2010 11:22:47 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87vd5glbad.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1286356988 20438 80.91.229.12 (6 Oct 2010 09:23:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 09:23:08 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M21056@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Oct 06 11:23:07 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P3QDE-0005l3-Sm for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 11:23:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1P3QD8-0007fI-G2; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 04:22:54 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1P3QD6-0007f0-Ka for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 04:22:52 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P3QD5-0005Iy-3e for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 04:22:52 -0500 Original-Received: from coquelicot-s.easter-eggs.com ([213.215.37.94]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1P3QD4-000656-00 for ; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 11:22:50 +0200 Original-Received: from cigue.easter-eggs.fr (cigue.easter-eggs.fr [10.0.0.33]) by rose.easter-eggs.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CCFC14191 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 11:22:46 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from jdanjou by cigue.easter-eggs.fr with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P3QD1-0001le-TP for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 11:22:47 +0200 Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Tue, 05 Oct 2010 22:10:57 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:72685 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Oct 05 2010, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Let's see... yeah, it syncs 100 articles "too much", and 100 lines is > about 3K, s=C3=A5 300K sounds right. The point of doing 100 articles "too > much" is to get any flag changes done by other MUAs, and the idea is > that it's most likely to happen to quite recent messages. > > This is 100 flags on articles we've seen before -- not new articles. > > But perhaps 100 is too much? 25 might be more reasonable? If I understand correctly, that seems a very dangerous behaviour. You mean that if I put/remove the \Seen flags on a very old mail from another Gnus instance, the other one will not see it? Maybe 100 is not enough actually? How others MUA plays with that? (Sorry if I misunderstand something :-) =2D-=20 Julien Danjou // =E1=90=B0 http://julien.danjou.info --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkysP+cACgkQpGK1HsL+5c1AjgCeKtANP6zBAm0KOArzWv7KoICj KdAAni3+Gk8Yx94ZY1ZFi3dY/qxdd9zV =Twfl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--