From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/70834 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Julien Danjou Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: That newfangled IMAP thing... Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 17:18:35 +0200 Message-ID: References: <8762yd6j4j.fsf@rimspace.net> <87eid0fsil.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87bp84y00w.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> <878w35ex1q.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87aanlde64.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87sk1dz236.fsf@uwo.ca> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1284477530 30112 80.91.229.12 (14 Sep 2010 15:18:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 15:18:50 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M19207@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Sep 14 17:18:47 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OvXHS-0000A8-Jw for ding-account@gmane.org; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 17:18:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OvXHO-0004ws-Gc; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 10:18:42 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OvXHN-0004wj-Ee for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 10:18:41 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OvXHI-0002tW-RP for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 10:18:41 -0500 Original-Received: from coquelicot-s.easter-eggs.com ([213.215.37.94]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1OvXHI-0001HO-00 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 17:18:36 +0200 Original-Received: from cigue.easter-eggs.fr (cigue.easter-eggs.fr [10.0.0.33]) by rose.easter-eggs.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7E4D14142 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 17:18:31 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from jdanjou by cigue.easter-eggs.fr with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OvXHH-0005xD-7y for ding@gnus.org; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 17:18:35 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Tue, 14 Sep 2010 17:10:10 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:70834 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Sep 14 2010, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Any ideas? My idea would be that flag storage should be *always* done in the backend (for mails at least :-). So the backend is the authority for the flags. In your example, if the server does not support flags, then, no flags for you. When it will support it, well, you will haz flags. My 2=C2=A2, =2D-=20 Julien Danjou // =E1=90=B0 http://julien.danjou.info --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkyPkksACgkQpGK1HsL+5c1PZwCg4wTP5aIQo2r5mJ/NAN0BATJb cLYAnilo3TBq49fQzPEu4+J2d4JO8kiF =a3iO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--