On Tue, Oct 05 2010, Stephen Berman wrote:

> I've attached two backtraces, the first from the faulty completion with
> Emacs running under the daemon, the second from good completion with
> Emacs not running under the daemon.  They show relevant differences,
> though I don't see anything indicating how those differences arose (much
> less what the daemon has to do with it); hope you do.

I don't see any difference in the backtraces. Is it my eyes? :)

-- 
Julien Danjou
// ᐰ <julien@danjou.info>   http://julien.danjou.info