From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/5502 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: hardaker@ece.ucdavis.edu (Wes Hardaker) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Sorting summary - cached articles Date: 11 Mar 1996 10:31:26 -0800 Organization: blah Message-ID: References: <9603082052.AA29818@cheux.ecs.umass.edu> Reply-To: hardaker@ece.ucdavis.edu NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035146097 539 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:34:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:34:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@ifi.uio.no Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.3/8.6.9) with SMTP id LAA19073 for ; Mon, 11 Mar 1996 11:17:47 -0800 Original-Received: from teal.ece.ucdavis.edu (hardaker@teal.ece.ucdavis.edu [128.120.54.142]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id ; Mon, 11 Mar 1996 19:31:38 +0100 Original-Received: by teal.ece.ucdavis.edu (1.37.109.16/Ultrix3.0-C/eecs 1.1) id AA225619095; Mon, 11 Mar 1996 10:31:35 -0800 Original-To: larsi@ifi.uio.no (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen) X-Face: #qW^}a%m*T^{A:Cp}$R\"38+d}41-Z}uU8,r%F#c#s:~Nzp0G9](s?,K49KJ]s"*7gvRgA SrAvQc4@/}L7Qc=w{)]ACO\R{LF@S{pXfojjjGg6c;q6{~C}CxC^^&~(F]`1W)%9j/iS/IM",B1 M.?{w8ckLTYD'`|kTr\i\cgY)P4 X-Url: http://www.ece.ucdavis.edu/~hardaker In-Reply-To: larsi@ifi.uio.no's message of 09 Mar 1996 23:56:46 +0100 Original-Lines: 15 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:5502 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:5502 >>>>> "Lars" == Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: Lars> Jack Vinson writes: >> Should cached articles get sorted along with all the rest of >> them? Lars> Yes. You know, I've been wanting to have a sort function that checked to see if something was ticked or cached or whatever (ie, sort based on article marks). For instance, I want all my ticked articles to be at the top. This of course gets more complex when threads are involved. Arg. I haven't looked into writing this function yet... Wes