Gnus development mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wes Hardaker <wes@hardakers.net>
Subject: Re: Question regarding the new multiplaned x-face
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 13:19:07 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sd6664fx6c.fsf@wanderer.hardakers.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <microsoft-free.x4zo3gr8gs.fsf@slackware.mynet.pc> (Steve Youngs's message of "Tue, 15 Jan 2002 06:19:47 +1000")

>>>>> On Tue, 15 Jan 2002 06:19:47 +1000, Steve Youngs <youngs@xemacs.org> said:

WH> I'm assuming probably exmh is more popular than gnus.  I think
WH> zmail might be more popular as well, and it also displays xfaces.

SY> OK, but what is it about these that makes them more popular than Gnus?

SY> Is it "ease of use"?  

Yes.

SY> Do they have more/better features?  

No.  gnus certainly has just about every function under the sun :-)
(at least that's why I use it) exmh is very good and is "prettier".
IE, it's graphical and not based on a text based editor so it just
looks "pretty" in comparison (even though I'm not a tk-look-n-feel
fan).  Speed is probably an issue, as gnus is generally slower (elisp
just isn't that fast).

SY> Is Gnus lacking in some respect?

SY> Is it just a marketing issue?

Yes, it runs under emacs and the majority of the world doesn't want to
run emacs as their operating system (I do, however, so...)

SY> Do we care?

Nope.

-- 
"Ninjas aren't dangerous.  They're more afraid of you than you are of them."



  reply	other threads:[~2002-01-14 21:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-01-12 20:27 Torsten Hilbrich
2002-01-14  5:31 ` Wes Hardaker
2002-01-14 12:11   ` Steve Youngs
2002-01-14 18:23     ` Wes Hardaker
2002-01-14 20:19       ` Steve Youngs
2002-01-14 21:19         ` Wes Hardaker [this message]
2002-01-14 21:20         ` Russ Allbery
2002-01-15  2:53         ` Andrew J Cosgriff
2002-01-15 10:52       ` Per Abrahamsen
2002-01-25 16:12         ` Wes Hardaker
2002-01-19 22:08 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2002-01-20 14:18   ` Oystein Viggen
2002-01-20 15:53     ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2002-01-21  2:01       ` Daniel Pittman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sd6664fx6c.fsf@wanderer.hardakers.net \
    --to=wes@hardakers.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).