From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/6783 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Wes Hardaker Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: suspend should kill other frames? Date: 18 Jun 1996 10:53:38 -0700 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035147188 4725 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:53:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:53:08 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id LAA16547 for ; Tue, 18 Jun 1996 11:12:48 -0700 Original-Received: from teal.ece.ucdavis.edu (hardaker@teal.ece.ucdavis.edu [128.120.54.142]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Tue, 18 Jun 1996 19:53:43 +0200 Original-Received: by teal.ece.ucdavis.edu (1.37.109.16/Ultrix3.0-C/eecs 1.1) id AA253540418; Tue, 18 Jun 1996 10:53:39 -0700 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no Original-Lines: 15 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.2.19/XEmacs 19.13 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6783 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6783 Here's a thought: When you suspend (z) gnus, should it kill the other frames it creates? I would say yes. They should disappear when gnus does. When the person goes back to gnus, they should be re-created. (maybe iconified?) -- _____ Wes Hardaker / ___ \ Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering / / \//\ University of California at Davis __________________ \--/ /--\ Davis CA 95616 / Recycle! \ \//\___/ / (hardaker@ece.ucdavis.edu) / It's not too late! \ \_____/