From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/5707 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: hardaker@ece.ucdavis.edu (Wes Hardaker) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Sorting summary - cached articles Date: 25 Mar 1996 11:23:23 -0800 Organization: blah Message-ID: References: <9603082052.AA29818@cheux.ecs.umass.edu> Reply-To: hardaker@ece.ucdavis.edu NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035146272 1116 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:37:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:37:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: larsi@ifi.uio.no (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen), ding@ifi.uio.no Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.3/8.6.9) with SMTP id LAA16450 for ; Mon, 25 Mar 1996 11:58:30 -0800 Original-Received: from teal.ece.ucdavis.edu (hardaker@teal.ece.ucdavis.edu [128.120.54.142]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id ; Mon, 25 Mar 1996 20:24:13 +0100 Original-Received: by teal.ece.ucdavis.edu (1.37.109.16/Ultrix3.0-C/eecs 1.1) id AA173741806; Mon, 25 Mar 1996 11:23:26 -0800 Original-To: albrecht@auto.tuwien.ac.at (Albrecht Kadlec) X-Face: #qW^}a%m*T^{A:Cp}$R\"38+d}41-Z}uU8,r%F#c#s:~Nzp0G9](s?,K49KJ]s"*7gvRgA SrAvQc4@/}L7Qc=w{)]ACO\R{LF@S{pXfojjjGg6c;q6{~C}CxC^^&~(F]`1W)%9j/iS/IM",B1 M.?{w8ckLTYD'`|kTr\i\cgY)P4 X-Url: http://www.ece.ucdavis.edu/~hardaker In-Reply-To: albrecht@vlsivie.tuwien.ac.at.'s message of 18 Mar 1996 14:24:25 +0100 Original-Lines: 21 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:5707 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:5707 >>>>> "Albrecht" == Albrecht Kadlec writes: W> You know, I've been wanting to have a sort function that W> checked to see if something was ticked or cached or whatever W> (ie, sort based on article marks). For instance, I want all my W> ticked articles to be at the top. This of course gets more W> complex when threads are involved. Arg. I haven't looked into W> writing this function yet... Albrecht> why not raise the score on ticking and then sort the Albrecht> threads via score? Cause I have enough stupid things that rely on scoring and I didn't want to play with it anymore. I'd have to increase the score by like 10,000 or so to have it truly end up at the top. 1000 wouldn't be enough for threads that had say, 2 responses from Lars in it since the total score of the thread would be 2000... :-) Wouldn't this be cool as a real smiley? Awesome idea Lars. Wes