Gnus development mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wes Hardaker <wes@hardakers.net>
Subject: Re: new feature request: highlights on scoring matches
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 07:54:44 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sdn0lm1tbv.fsf@wanderer.hardakers.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3wuku6y9d.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org> (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Fri, 24 Jan 2003 22:20:14 +0100")

>>>>> On Fri, 24 Jan 2003 22:20:14 +0100, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> said:

Lars> Hm...  These expressions would do nothing but highlight regions
Lars> in the summary buffer?  Yes, and then the scoring code could add
Lars> more of these matches to the mechanism, like you say.  Yes, that
Lars> sounds a lot cleaner than hacking up something in the scoring
Lars> code itself.

That's what I thought.

Lars> On the other hand, if the score rule is, say "^hello" on
Lars> Subject, just adding that to a list of highlighting regexps and
Lars> running it over the buffer won't match anything.  And there'll
Lars> be misleading matches between, say, Subject and From as
Lars> displayed.

Err, good point.

Lars> No, perhaps it isn't as simple as that.  The highlighting would
Lars> have to be applied before the strings are entered into the
Lars> buffer.  That could be done by transforming a copy of the header
Lars> structure before it is inserted into the buffer...

Well, just having a basic-infrastructure for highlighting I think is
the first correct step.  If nothing else, people can hind-rewrite
their expressions for scoring for highlighting use.

I wonder if there are any tricky cases other than ^ and $.  I'd have
to think about it, because otherwise those could be easily replaced.
err, no they couldn't as the summary line format is different for
every person.  arg.

-- 
"The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will
 insist on coming along and trying to put things in it."   -- Terry Pratchett



  reply	other threads:[~2003-01-27 15:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-01-21 14:48 Wes Hardaker
2003-01-21 23:03 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2003-01-21 23:17   ` Andreas Fuchs
2003-01-22  0:26   ` Wes Hardaker
2003-01-22  0:28   ` Wes Hardaker
2003-01-24 21:20     ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2003-01-27 15:54       ` Wes Hardaker [this message]
2003-02-01 16:17         ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2003-02-04 17:05           ` Wes Hardaker
2003-02-07 12:33             ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sdn0lm1tbv.fsf@wanderer.hardakers.net \
    --to=wes@hardakers.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).