From: Wes Hardaker <wes@hardakers.net>
Subject: Re: Benchmarking Gnus
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 07:29:18 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sdn0yu5yk1.fsf@wanderer.hardakers.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2n665jnr15.fsf@zsh.cs.rochester.edu> (ShengHuo ZHU's message of "Wed, 30 Jan 2002 22:22:14 -0500")
>>>>> On Wed, 30 Jan 2002 22:22:14 -0500, ShengHuo ZHU <zsh@cs.rochester.edu> said:
ZSH> Mine is 45.5 meg right now. It was reported that the image cache used
ZSH> a lot of memory. In Emacs, setting a small image-cache-eviction-delay
ZSH> or running clear-image-cache may help a little. But I am not sure
ZSH> about XEmacs.
ZSH> Anyway, after adding 256 meg memory, I don't care much about that now.
I have 256 and I start caring when I start trying to run a lot of
things (like vmware NT with 128 for it), etc...
Is there any way to figure out where memory is going in emacs/xemacs?
The obvious things (a buffer) shows nothing. The largest buffer is a
nnimap history buffer, but it's only 4 megs.
--
"Ninjas aren't dangerous. They're more afraid of you than you are of them."
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-31 15:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-27 0:30 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2002-01-27 0:35 ` IPmonger
2002-01-27 0:45 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2002-01-29 16:03 ` IPmonger
2002-01-30 8:53 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-01-30 16:42 ` IPmonger
2002-01-30 17:38 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-01-30 18:15 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2002-01-30 18:42 ` Josh Huber
2002-02-04 23:35 ` IPmonger
2002-02-04 23:48 ` IPmonger
2002-02-04 23:57 ` Daniel Pittman
2002-01-30 22:02 ` Wes Hardaker
2002-01-30 22:09 ` IPmonger
2002-01-31 1:25 ` Wes Hardaker
2002-01-31 3:22 ` ShengHuo ZHU
2002-01-31 15:29 ` Wes Hardaker [this message]
2002-01-31 16:34 ` Steinar Bang
2002-01-31 16:54 ` Bjørn Mork
2002-01-31 20:50 ` Steinar Bang
2002-01-31 22:35 ` Bjørn Mork
2002-02-01 7:14 ` Steinar Bang
2002-02-01 9:17 ` Bjørn Mork
2002-02-01 10:00 ` Steinar Bang
2002-02-01 11:24 ` Bjørn Mork
2002-02-01 11:29 ` Simon Josefsson
2002-02-01 12:52 ` Steinar Bang
2002-02-01 13:40 ` Simon Josefsson
2002-02-01 14:12 ` Steinar Bang
2002-02-01 14:39 ` ShengHuo ZHU
2002-02-01 15:01 ` Simon Josefsson
2002-02-01 15:31 ` Steinar Bang
2002-02-01 14:59 ` Simon Josefsson
2002-02-01 15:18 ` Steinar Bang
2002-02-01 16:51 ` Wes Hardaker
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-01-16 2:12 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2002-01-16 4:42 ` Russ Allbery
2002-01-19 23:25 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2002-01-16 6:35 ` Jesper Harder
2002-01-19 23:25 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2002-01-16 12:45 ` Simon Josefsson
2002-01-16 16:51 ` Josh Huber
2002-01-16 17:21 ` Karl Kleinpaste
2002-01-16 19:26 ` Steinar Bang
2002-01-17 2:06 ` Daniel Pittman
2002-01-17 17:04 ` Ami Fischman
2002-01-19 23:28 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2002-01-20 19:11 ` Ami Fischman
2002-01-20 19:15 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2002-01-20 20:05 ` Ami Fischman
2002-01-20 20:03 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2002-01-20 20:33 ` Ami Fischman
2002-01-18 23:42 ` Jesper Harder
2002-01-19 11:38 ` Simon Josefsson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sdn0yu5yk1.fsf@wanderer.hardakers.net \
--to=wes@hardakers.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).