From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/76372 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Wes Hardaker Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: upgrade notes Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 12:29:38 -0800 Message-ID: References: <87y65v91ef.fsf@gnus.org> <87hbcj8znm.fsf@gnus.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1296851450 17870 80.91.229.12 (4 Feb 2011 20:30:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 20:30:50 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M24723@lists.math.uh.edu Fri Feb 04 21:30:46 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PlSIi-0007FX-9u for ding-account@gmane.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 21:30:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PlSHu-0005Jn-Ra; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 14:29:50 -0600 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PlSHs-0005Jd-B3 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 14:29:48 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PlSHn-0006Q8-LD for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 14:29:47 -0600 Original-Received: from mail.hardakers.net ([168.150.236.43]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PlSHm-0005ve-Kh for ding@gnus.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 21:29:42 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (wjh.hardakers.net [10.0.0.2]) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0FF0B234CD for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 12:29:40 -0800 (PST) Face: 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 i3bRphBM04dZ2dI6yMLjmGFqnIok/cB1YU8sJAACTeuHOd5+lumQHfDM6KyLqEm4aWkkcc1m4PqBewZxBZOg44lT+aJiexDteewboiVhxAjSHxQwhiYJEdCR6tMN1/uckirDRNbsgAAAAASUVORK5CYII= In-Reply-To: <87hbcj8znm.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Fri, 04 Feb 2011 09:42:21 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:76372 Archived-At: >>>>> On Fri, 04 Feb 2011 09:42:21 -0800, Lars Ingebrigtsen said: LI> Oh, right. Otherwise everything is OK? It's showing the correct number LI> of messages and everything? Yep. The unread number gets updated. LI> The % mark is something that I must admit I can't recall ever hearing LI> about, even though "git blame" claims that I added it in 1998. So it's LI> supposed to appear on groups that have new mail after you do a `g'? LI> That sounds quite useful, actually. :-) It is (err... was)... LI> Is this correct? The `%' would stay there over several `g' runs? I may LI> be misreading the code. Yep. That's correct. If I enter the group, but don't read anything, and exit it would go away. Functionally it was an "indication that new mail was in the group since the last time I had been in it". LI> 1) Ignore the issue. "% is for client-side splits" :-( LI> 2) Have nnimap follow the semantics for the other mail backends, and add LI> a dummy thing to nnmail-split-history if a `g' registers new messages. LI> Simple enough to do. That sounds like it would work. I think. Since I'm not familiar with how splitting in gnus is done (I used it once back in like, um, 1960 I think) I'm not sure if that sentence meets my functionality described above or not. LI> 3) Add a new ?W spec (or something) that would just show a "%" on LI> all groups with unseen messages. I *think* that's right too. I have lots of "unread" messages in groups because I typically will go into a box, read something and then "unmark" it again because I need to deal with it later (where read-marks are left on stuff that is "don't delete yet, but it's not functionally a todo-list item"). -- Wes Hardaker My Pictures: http://capturedonearth.com/ My Thoughts: http://pontifications.hardakers.net/