From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/36835 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Wes Hardaker Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: picons? Date: 10 Jul 2001 08:03:00 -0700 Organization: Network Associates - NAI Labs Message-ID: References: <87k81s2of8.fsf@inanna.rimspace.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035172355 10710 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:52:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:52:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Daniel Pittman , ding@gnus.org Return-Path: Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 27604 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2001 15:05:38 -0000 Original-Received: from dns2.hardaker.davis.ca.us (HELO wanderer.hardakers.net) (root@168.150.190.2) by gnus.org with SMTP; 10 Jul 2001 15:05:38 -0000 Original-Received: (from hardaker@localhost) by wanderer.hardakers.net (8.11.2/8.11.2) id f6AF30s07527; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 08:03:00 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: wanderer.hardakers.net: hardaker set sender to wes@hardakers.net using -f Original-To: Pavel@Janik.cz (Pavel =?iso-8859-2?q?Jan=EDk?=) X-URL: http://dcas.ucdavis.edu/~hardaker X-Face: #qW^}a%m*T^{A:Cp}$R\"38+d}41-Z}uU8,r%F#c#s:~Nzp0G9](s?,K49KJ]s"*7gvRgA SrAvQc4@/}L7Qc=w{)]ACO\R{LF@S{pXfojjjGg6c;q6{~C}CxC^^&~(F]`1W)%9j/iS/ IM",B1M.?{w8ckLTYD'`|kTr\i\cgY)P4 In-Reply-To: (Pavel@Janik.cz's message of "Tue, 10 Jul 2001 00:13:11 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090001 (Oort Gnus v0.01) XEmacs/21.2 (Terspichore) Original-Lines: 15 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36835 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36835 >>>>> On Tue, 10 Jul 2001 00:13:11 +0200, Pavel@Janik.cz (Pavel Jan=EDk) sa= id: Pavel> I do not think it is easy to port picons to GNU Emacs 21, Pavel> because it does/will not support annotations and thus it will Pavel> consist of writing an emulation layer below the actual code. Or Pavel> (maybe better solution ;-) complete rewrite of gnus-picons.el Pavel> to be almost independent of Emacs's implementation with a small Pavel> implementation dependent layer below it. What do you think? I was thinking that the annotations layer would move lower and a generic "gnus-insert-image" defun was needed that would be implemented differently on the two different architectures (Emacs vs XEmacs). --=20 "Ninjas aren't dangerous. They're more afraid of you than you are of them."