From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/42816
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Wes Hardaker <wes@hardakers.net>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Benchmarking Gnus
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 17:25:28 -0800
Organization: Network Associates - NAI Labs
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <sdsn8nwbuf.fsf@wanderer.hardakers.net>
References: <m3u1t8fxei.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org>
	<sdlmefijky.fsf@wanderer.hardakers.net>
	<m3u1t3h4nf.fsf@cornelius.delamancha.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035178009 14197 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 05:26:49 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 05:26:49 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: Gnus Mailing List <ding@gnus.org>
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: (qmail 24312 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2002 01:27:57 -0000
Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu (mail@129.7.128.13)
  by mastaler.com with SMTP; 31 Jan 2002 01:27:57 -0000
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists)
	by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1)
	id 16W604-0001t4-00; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 19:26:52 -0600
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Wed, 30 Jan 2002 19:26:42 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66])
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id TAA25970
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 19:26:20 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: (qmail 24287 invoked by alias); 31 Jan 2002 01:26:19 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 24282 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2002 01:26:18 -0000
Original-Received: from dns2.hardaker.davis.ca.us (HELO wanderer.hardakers.net) (?ccTbWFSbIEPZbO9zgjMdQ8SZ7EfMadMv?@168.150.190.2)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 31 Jan 2002 01:26:18 -0000
Original-Received: (from hardaker@localhost)
	by wanderer.hardakers.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0V1PS705855;
	Wed, 30 Jan 2002 17:25:28 -0800
Original-To: IPmonger <ipmonger@delamancha.org>
X-Face: #qW^}a%m*T^{A:Cp}$R\"38+d}41-Z}uU8,r%F#c#s:~Nzp0G9](s?,K49KJ]s"*7gvRgA
 SrAvQc4@/}L7Qc=w{)]ACO\R{LF@S{pXfojjjGg6c;q6{~C}CxC^^&~(F]`1W)%9j/iS/
 IM",B1M.?{w8ckLTYD'`|kTr\i\cgY)P4
In-Reply-To: <m3u1t3h4nf.fsf@cornelius.delamancha.org> (IPmonger's message
 of "Wed, 30 Jan 2002 17:09:56 -0500")
Original-Lines: 28
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) XEmacs/21.4 (Civil Service,
 i686-pc-linux)
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:42816
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:42816

>>>>> On Wed, 30 Jan 2002 17:09:56 -0500, IPmonger <ipmonger@delamancha.org> said:

ipmonger> Wes Hardaker <wes@hardakers.net> writes:
>> Actually, I've recently discovered that I have a different
>> profiling problem I need to solve:
>> 
>> hardaker  3772  6.1 30.9 87020 78868 pts/2   S    13:15   2:43 xemacs
>> ^^^^^ ^^^^^
>> 
>> Anyone else see problems like this?  cvs update from ~ Jan 25th.

ipmonger> Um, I'm not seeing that problem.  Admittedly, I'm running gnus from
ipmonger> ~ Jan 28th w/XEmacs 21.1 on RedHat 7.2 i686 Linux:

ipmonger> 2651 ipmonger  14   0 20180  19M 12248 S    11.2 10.7  49:49 xemacs

ipmonger> If gnus is responsible, then it's either not nnml (which is the only
ipmonger> back-end I use) or it's been corrected...

Gnus is definitely responsible.  I finally did run it for a while
without gnus and didn't get any major memory leaks.  Immediately after
starting gnus and entering a few groups, I'm back at huge memory
usages.  sigh...

However, these are imap folders.

-- 
"Ninjas aren't dangerous.  They're more afraid of you than you are of them."