From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/6752 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mats.Lofdahl@astro.su.se (Mats G. Lofdahl) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Automatic generation of split methods Date: 18 Jun 1996 12:25:25 +0100 Sender: mats@astro.su.se Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035147162 4611 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:52:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:52:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@ifi.uio.no Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id EAA12223 for ; Tue, 18 Jun 1996 04:04:46 -0700 Original-Received: from mail.datakom.su.se (mail.datakom.su.se [130.237.162.47]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Tue, 18 Jun 1996 12:26:33 +0200 Original-Received: (from uucp@localhost) by mail.datakom.su.se (8.7.3/8.7.3) id KAA10973; Tue, 18 Jun 1996 10:25:15 GMT Original-Received: from hugin.astro.su.se(130.237.166.25) by mail via smap (V1.3) id sma010960; Tue Jun 18 12:24:51 1996 Original-Received: from royacs.astro.su.se by hugin (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA05163; Tue, 18 Jun 96 12:25:05 +0200 Original-Received: by royacs.astro.su.se; (5.65/1.1.8.2/14Nov95-0416PM) id AA13397; Tue, 18 Jun 1996 12:25:25 +0100 Original-To: Benny Amorsen X-Attribution: Mats In-Reply-To: Benny Amorsen's message of 17 Jun 1996 18:26:14 +0200 Original-Lines: 26 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.2.19/Emacs 19.31 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6752 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6752 Benny Amorsen writes: > It would be nice if gnus could automagically generate > nnmail-split-methods a la the automagical generation of score file > entries. Maybe make another file containing split methods. Why not implement splitting for the other backends as well? Then put split methods in the score files? And merge splitting and scoring interfaces? =20 Splitting of nntp groups would make it possible to e.g. have subgroups to high-volume groups only containing particular threads, threads with contributions from particular authors (like yourself), announcements, high scores, etc. Wouldn't this make it faster to enter (sorting much fewer threads) high volume groups for just looking at interesting stuff, while retaining the possibility to look at the other threads some other time (which you don't have if you score low enough to kill). =20 Or would this be incredibly slow? --=20 Mats L=F6fdahl Internet: Mats@Astro.su.se Stockholm Observatory MLofdahl@Solar.Stanford.edu S-133 36 Saltsj=F6baden Voice: +46 - 8 16 44 75 Sweden Fax: +46 - 8 16 42 28