From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/53576 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lloyd Zusman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Looking for the variable that controls newsgroup scanning Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 19:25:38 -0400 Organization: FreeBSD/Linux Hippopotamus Preserve Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <847k65a17w.fsf@slowfox.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> <4r194cd4.fsf@asfast.com> <84oezggvys.fsf@slowfox.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1059434794 15492 80.91.224.249 (28 Jul 2003 23:26:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 23:26:34 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M2120@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Jul 29 01:26:30 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19hHNu-000416-00 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 01:26:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 19hHNF-0007SN-00; Mon, 28 Jul 2003 18:25:49 -0500 Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com ([64.157.176.121]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 19hHN7-0007SF-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 28 Jul 2003 18:25:41 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 56683 invoked by alias); 28 Jul 2003 23:25:41 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 56678 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2003 23:25:41 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO asfast.net) (xx7wos@216.182.10.250) by sclp3.sclp.com with SMTP; 28 Jul 2003 23:25:41 -0000 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 0) by asfast.net with local; Mon, 28 Jul 2003 19:25:39 -0400 Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Face: "!ga1s|?LNLE3MeeeEYs(%LIl9q[xV9!j4#xf4!**BFW_ihlOb;:Slb>)vy>CJM Lloyd Zusman writes: > >> Well, I mentioned in a subsequent message (that you probably didn't get >> to yet) that the groups are all at the same level). > > Ah, hm. So you have several nnimap groups, all from the same server, > and they behave differently? Weird. Yep. > You could also try `G e' on those groups to see if the select method > is the same. Sometimes, people have "nnimap:foo" (including the > quotes) for some groups and (nnimap "foo" ...) (including the > parentheses) for others. Please convert them all to the "nnimap:foo" > variant. > > Does `G E' show a difference? I checked `G e' and `G E', and all look equivalent. And in each case, it's "nnimap:foo" and not (nnimap "foo" ...). And did I mention that when I'm in the summary buffer for any of these groups, invoking `gnus-summary-rescan-group' will always correctly detect new messages for each nnimap server? It's only `gnus-group-get-new-news' that fails to do that for the 2nd through n-th imap groups. -- Lloyd Zusman ljz@asfast.com