Gnus development mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: gdt@work.lexort.com
Cc: ding@gnus.org
Subject: Re: Hashcash on by default?
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 08:24:23 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <smud5ff137s.fsf@linuxpal.mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87d5ffrwi7.fsf@latte.josefsson.org> (Simon Josefsson's message of "Tue, 18 Apr 2006 12:47:12 +0200")

Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com> writes:

> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:
>
>> I just switched on async hashcash generation:
>>
>> (setq message-generate-hashcash t)
>>
>> I think it's kinda neat how those payment lines appear in the buffer
>> asynchronously.  :-)  But perhaps we should just switch this on by
>> default?  I mean, if you don't have hashcash installed, it won't do
>> anything, and if you do have hashcash installed, you probably want to
>> use it.  And since the impact now is so low (what with it being
>> asynchronous and all), I think it makes sense.
>
> I like that.  I've changed the default.

I just updated and tested this.  When following up to an article in
nnimap, I got two hashcash lines inserted (correctly) after a few
seconds.

When sending mail by typing 'm' in *Group*, and then entering a name,
I found that hashcash was generated non-async when I hit ^C^C.  Is
this the intended behavior?

It would be neat to begin generating hashcash once the user has
stopped editing the To:/CC: fields for a few seconds, and regenerate
any missing entries after the next edit/pause cycle, and then do a
final insert/generate on sending.  This would always be correct, and
minimize delays - but sounds like a lot of work, especially for
something that could be done in the background as part of sending.

-- 
	Greg Troxel <gdt@work.lexort.com>



  reply	other threads:[~2006-04-18 12:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-04-15 13:22 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2006-04-15 23:42 ` Miles Bader
2006-04-16  0:38   ` Adam Sjøgren
2006-04-17  3:54   ` Manoj Srivastava
2006-04-18 10:47 ` Simon Josefsson
2006-04-18 12:24   ` gdt [this message]
2006-04-18 13:42     ` Simon Josefsson
2006-04-18 13:59       ` gdt
2006-04-18 19:37   ` Raymond Scholz
2006-04-18 20:20     ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2006-04-18 20:30       ` Ted Zlatanov
2006-04-18 21:00       ` Reiner Steib
2006-04-18 22:28         ` Steve Youngs
2006-04-19 13:03           ` Reiner Steib
2006-04-18 22:32         ` Simon Josefsson
2006-04-21 23:50         ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2006-04-25 15:50 Reiner Steib
2006-04-30 10:26 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=smud5ff137s.fsf@linuxpal.mit.edu \
    --to=gdt@work.lexort.com \
    --cc=ding@gnus.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).