From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/63589 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: gdt@work.lexort.com Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: why does message-generate-headers take so long? Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 11:34:01 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87sljorsdx.fsf@gate450.dyndns.org> <87hd03j103.fsf@latte.josefsson.org> <87mz9vh49p.fsf@latte.josefsson.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1156347409 17899 80.91.229.2 (23 Aug 2006 15:36:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 15:36:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Andreas Seltenreich , ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+m12116@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Aug 23 17:36:48 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GFukr-0007us-4X for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 17:34:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1GFukm-0004Yi-00; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 10:34:52 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1GFuk8-0004Yc-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 10:34:12 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.227.211]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GFuk8-0006wy-40 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 10:34:12 -0500 Original-Received: from linuxpal.mit.edu ([18.62.1.14]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1GFuk6-0007xn-00 for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 17:34:10 +0200 Original-Received: by linuxpal.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 9545) id 390001606E; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 11:34:05 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: Wes Hardaker In-Reply-To: <87mz9vh49p.fsf@latte.josefsson.org> (Simon Josefsson's message of "Wed, 23 Aug 2006 17:15:46 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (berkeley-unix) X-Hashcash: 1:20:060823:ding@gnus.org::vcS1hhhjPT7Kp4+I:00001i3C X-Hashcash: 1:20:060823:andreas@gate450.dyndns.org::R6mZ3Y3XE6TM1o01:0000000000000000000000000000000000026Iq X-Hashcash: 1:20:060823:wes@hardakers.net::OvNAkdBvtm3wlmsk:000000000000000000000000000000000000000000008iek X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-) Precedence: bulk Original-Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:63589 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable With async payments, the pain of hashcash is very low. And, this only affects people with hashcash installed on their systems. So, I think it's reasonable to keep it. What would be nice (I don't have the clue level and my papers aren't in order...) would be to be able to rerun the async payment processsing (that starts when a reply is created) whenever there are addresses in the header (perhaps starting a few seconds after the cursor is not in a header line). --=20 Greg Troxel --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (NetBSD) iD8DBQFE7HVtH9p66AmO1g4RAvsoAJ4gnTeTbScVeFUbTKw8GJljjBWg2wCfTgHz XVDvm9+VS9JO44t1vc83VZ4= =NpY9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--