From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/63355 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: gdt@work.lexort.com Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Gcc when article is already mailed Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 09:34:44 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87y7w06k05.fsf@nokile.rath.org> <8764j3nbdv.fsf@obelix.mork.no> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1150292119 23519 80.91.229.2 (14 Jun 2006 13:35:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 13:35:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+m11882@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Jun 14 15:35:17 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FqVWb-0000Py-KR for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 15:35:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1FqVWW-0006sI-00; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 08:35:08 -0500 Original-Received: from nas01.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.39]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1FqVWG-0006sD-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 08:34:52 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by nas01.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FqVWG-00077I-0E for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 08:34:52 -0500 Original-Received: from linuxpal.mit.edu ([18.62.1.14]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1FqVWF-0000k9-00 for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 15:34:51 +0200 Original-Received: by linuxpal.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 9545) id 9FA9616070; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 09:34:46 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F8rn?= Mork In-Reply-To: <8764j3nbdv.fsf@obelix.mork.no> (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F8rn?= Mork's message of "Wed, 14 Jun 2006 14:57:00 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (berkeley-unix) X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-) Precedence: bulk Original-Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:63355 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I guess there is a reason why it does things this way: Gnus can't know that the Gcc will fail before trying it, at which time the message has already been sent to via SMTP. Maybe trying Gcc first would be an acceptable fix? Does it have any downside? I guess it will cause the reversed problem: Gcc works but SMTP fails. But that would probably be better, given enough warning so that the user knows the message was not sent. Or? To work, it will have to keep state about which has worked. So probably Gcc first, and delete the line on success, and then SMTP, so then the nndraft: mechanism can handle queueing for both issues. --=20 Greg Troxel --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (NetBSD) iD8DBQFEkBB2H9p66AmO1g4RAibHAJ0Uhkm7wpyIQWCflltiDs6zx4+dfwCeN6sR UWa9YjplohD5YPcuiCmN5qE= =h65O -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--