From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/69767 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Greg Troxel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: easypg status? Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 09:31:43 -0400 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1277904799 12290 80.91.229.12 (30 Jun 2010 13:33:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 13:33:19 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M18158@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Jun 30 15:33:15 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OTxPf-0005fK-KM for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 15:33:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OTxOG-0007x5-W1; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 08:31:49 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OTxOF-0007wu-Dn for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 08:31:47 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OTxOD-00016O-Tl for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 08:31:46 -0500 Original-Received: from linuxpal.mit.edu ([18.62.1.14]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1OTxOD-00027K-00 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 15:31:45 +0200 Original-Received: by linuxpal.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 9545) id 1A5C317DAD; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 09:31:43 -0400 (EDT) X-Hashcash: 1:20:100630:ding@gnus.org::7L11WjVGQr8ihiK7:00002G4f User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.1 (berkeley-unix) X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:69767 Archived-At: What's the status of EasyPG these days? It seems that the contents of epg cvs and emacs 23 are ~ the same, and it's the default in gnus/message-mode. Is there any reason to pay attention to epg cvs then, or is it a completed work that's now integrated and I should just happily use it in emacs? Specifically, I created a package in pkgsrc for it, and I'm wondering if I should just remove it.