Re: [bug] Mark limit score

[Frank Schmitt <usereplyto@Frank-Schmitt.net>]

Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Großjohann) writes:
 
>Note how the argument is not optional anymore (callers can supply
>gnus-summary-default-score if they like) and how the N spec for
>interactive uses the prefix arg, if supplied, but prompts for a number
>if no prefix arg is supplied.

This looks great.

>Maybe we would like to make the argument optional, so that you don't
>have to supply it when calling from Lisp.  But OTOH, there is no call
>to this function from Lisp, so maybe this is pointless.

Yepp, I too don't think that this is needed.

BTW: How about an (additional) enhanced function which limits to
articles with a score within %small and %big (we need to ask the user
for %small and %big of course.)

One more thought: I heard several reports that people don't understand
from the name what Mark limit actually does. I too think that the name
could be improved.

How about "Filter articles" instead of "Mark limit"?

-- 
One Ring to rule them all, One Ring to find them,
One Ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them
In the Land of Mordor where the Shadows lie.
19. Dezember 2001