From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/4766 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stainless Steel Rat Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: PGP Encrypted Mailing Lists (FYI) Date: 17 Jan 1996 09:37:41 -0500 Organization: The Happy Fun Ball Brigade Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035145467 30713 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:24:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:24:27 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by miranova.com (8.7.3/8.6.9) with SMTP id HAA03186 for ; Wed, 17 Jan 1996 07:36:43 -0800 Original-Received: from amber.ccs.neu.edu (root@amber.ccs.neu.edu [129.10.111.100]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Wed, 17 Jan 1996 15:38:26 +0100 Original-Received: from delphi.ccs.neu.edu (ratinox@delphi.ccs.neu.edu [129.10.112.101]) by amber.ccs.neu.edu (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id JAA22121 for ; Wed, 17 Jan 1996 09:38:18 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (ratinox@localhost) by delphi.ccs.neu.edu (8.6.12/8.6.4) id JAA09375; Wed, 17 Jan 1996 09:38:18 -0500 Original-To: "(ding) Gnus Mailing List" In-reply-to: Steven L Baur's message of 16 Jan 1996 20:34:09 -0800 X-NSA-Fodder: Khaddafi supercomputer Ortega fissionable Ft. Bragg X-Attribution: Rat Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:4766 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:4766 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>>>> "SLB" == Steven L Baur writes: [...] SLB> Is there a standard message format for this sort of thing? If it's SLB> like the remailer ``standards'' that appears to be written by SLB> whomever writes the code first. There is no such "standard" other than what might become a defacto standard through common usage. The only formatting standard PGP uses is the various PEM block defintions. This thing you have shown us is, IMO, a real mess. [...] SLB> I'm not sure what can reasonably be done with the header block at SLB> the bottom, though I know I want the opportunity of being able to SLB> take them and replace the bogus list supplied values with them. Write something for yourself and add it to mc-post-decryption-hook. SLB> The edit article sequence is confusing right now since the changes SLB> made are not reflected in the *Summary* buffer. This should probably SLB> be fixed. That is probably a bug :). From: ratinox@ccs.neu.edu To: ding@ifi.uio.no Message-ID: srg2deyjii.fsf@delphi.ccs.neu.edu Date: 17 Jan 1996 09 37:41 -0500 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBMP0Jyp6VRH7BJMxHAQGeEQQAsuGQXYFltIa5ohV7Cp2Fb/ilr5EldiXH uwTBU8qH+q4vjPzhtM0JUjVifdh1GlWxhm0BrYI+wZSlHeI0veHOTA6l8n9HWgaD imAr6d4mSAA35AsFGdUqm4aN29iU/csSvAxQO5TinmUssfD+3qkXLQ/7H0giymwK YhAa2KJRWSA= =vckv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Rat \ Warning: pregnant women, the elderly, and PGP Public Key: Ask for one today! \ children under 10 should avoid prolonged http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/ratinox/ \ exposure to Happy Fun Ball.