From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/4830 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stainless Steel Rat Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: (gnus-inews-domain-name); insertion of Sender: Date: 19 Jan 1996 20:46:21 -0500 Organization: The Happy Fun Ball Brigade Message-ID: References: <199601181337.OAA28961@ssv4.dina.kvl.dk> <199601190834.JAA01129@ssv4.dina.kvl.dk> <199601191014.LAA01179@ssv4.dina.kvl.dk> <199601191422.PAA01295@ssv4.dina.kvl.dk> <5568e82h73.fsf@galil.austnsc.tandem.com> <199601192038.VAA01777@ssv4.dina.kvl.dk> <55zqbj24mr.fsf@galil.austnsc.tandem.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035145522 30981 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:25:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:25:22 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by miranova.com (8.7.3/8.6.9) with SMTP id SAA06451 for ; Fri, 19 Jan 1996 18:35:27 -0800 Original-Received: from amber.ccs.neu.edu (root@amber.ccs.neu.edu [129.10.111.100]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Sat, 20 Jan 1996 02:46:41 +0100 Original-Received: from delphi.ccs.neu.edu (ratinox@delphi.ccs.neu.edu [129.10.112.101]) by amber.ccs.neu.edu (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id UAA11333 for ; Fri, 19 Jan 1996 20:46:35 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (ratinox@localhost) by delphi.ccs.neu.edu (8.6.12/8.6.4) id UAA16928; Fri, 19 Jan 1996 20:46:35 -0500 Original-To: "(ding) Gnus Mailing List" In-reply-to: Sten Drescher's message of 19 Jan 1996 16:37:00 -0600 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:4830 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:4830 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>>>> "SD" == Sten Drescher writes: SD> So Son-of-RFC 1036 is discarding its RFC 822 heritage on this SD> issue? No, it superceeds RFC 822, rendering parts of it obsolete. This is the nature of evolving standards. You will find many such documents in the RFC archives. RFC 822 has about a half-dozen or so current RFCs that partially superceed parts of it, and a number of them fully superceed previous versions of themselves. Look at the MIME and PEM RFCs sometime. SD> This is a problem for Gnus, since it needs to adhere to both SD> standards. No, it needs to adhere to the most recently defined standard. If it can also adhere to the earlier standards for backwards compatability then great, but in this case it is not required. From: ratinox@ccs.neu.edu To: ding@ifi.uio.no Message-ID: Date: 19 Jan 1996 20:46:21 -0500 Subject: Re: (gnus-inews-domain-name); insertion of Sender: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3 Charset: noconv iQCVAwUBMQBJbZ6VRH7BJMxHAQEpvwQApnaANqCBS4VBeC3Rj1e1WhTYBp1ahljt WqYQu9z874GpmiW7jEy1+ZiPLQkzGbH6nwOTNv0wC2rdm4nOkrNl6aG2JkrYHNfI QFchUdsxFLQJVfr050vJKskKxFKEmq6HGrNOf7gEtsyPKvbMeJi3RCUlP514hryC waGfbno9N/U= =K8cz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Rat \ Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball. PGP Public Key: Ask for one today! \ http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/ratinox/ \