From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/27221 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Brian May Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: scoring Date: 25 Nov 1999 11:03:32 +1100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035164285 23464 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 01:38:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 01:38:05 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from karazm.math.uh.edu (karazm.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.1]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA27873 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 1999 19:05:39 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by karazm.math.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAC09344; Wed, 24 Nov 1999 18:04:30 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Wed, 24 Nov 1999 18:04:25 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA18821 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 1999 18:04:15 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from silas-1.cc.monash.edu.au (bam@silas-1.cc.monash.edu.au [130.194.1.91]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA27860 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 1999 19:03:39 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from bam@localhost) by silas-1.cc.monash.edu.au (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id LAA15834; Thu, 25 Nov 1999 11:03:32 +1100 (EST) Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Home-Page: http://www.csse.monash.edu.au/~bmay/ Original-Lines: 31 User-Agent: Gnus/5.070098 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.98) XEmacs/20.4 (Emerald) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:27221 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:27221 Hello again, according to the info documentation: "Multiple crossposts" If you want to lower the score of articles that have been crossposted to more than, say, 3 groups: ("xref" ("[^:\n]+:[0-9]+ +[^:\n]+:[0-9]+ +[^:\n]+:[0-9]+" -1000 nil r)) However, this doesn't work, instead I have to use: ("xref" ("[^:]+:[0-9]+ +[^:]+:[0-9]+ +[^:]+:[0-9]+" -1000 nil r)) Which really puzzles me, as PGnus doesn't display any newlines within the Xref line. Is that notation a legal R.E.? Or perhaps PGnus removes newlines within the Xref line before displaying it? How can I confirm/deny this? "C-u g" shows the Xref line, as expected, without any newline characters. (My guess is that the example is wrong, and PGnus interprets "\" and "n" as two distinct characters, within [ and ] --- am I correct? Perhaps this is a bug somewhere on my system.) Another thing, while scoring based on the "Message-Id" works, scoring based on "thread" doesn't work (nothing matches). This has me rather puzzled, because I thought matching on thread is the same thing as matching on the "Message-Id", but with followups included, too. -- Brian May