From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/5567
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: albrecht@vlsivie.tuwien.ac.at (Albrecht Kadlec)
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Sorting summary - cached articles
Date: 18 Mar 1996 14:24:25 +0100
Organization: TU Wien
Sender: albrecht@vlsivie.tuwien.ac.at (Albrecht Kadlec)
Message-ID: <tirauqsfee.fsf@java.vlsivie.tuwien.ac.at>
References: <9603082052.AA29818@cheux.ecs.umass.edu>
	<x63f7hncfr.fsf@eyesore.no> <sd3f7fwkg1.fsf@teal.ece.ucdavis.edu>
Reply-To: albrecht@auto.tuwien.ac.at (Albrecht Kadlec)
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035146152 710 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:35:52 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:35:52 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: larsi@ifi.uio.no (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen), ding@ifi.uio.no
Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.3/8.6.9) with SMTP id GAA07061 for <steve@miranova.com>; Mon, 18 Mar 1996 06:30:32 -0800
Original-Received: from kodiak.vlsivie.tuwien.ac.at (kodiak.vlsivie.tuwien.ac.at [128.130.40.140]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <OAA08238@ifi.uio.no> ; Mon, 18 Mar 1996 14:30:48 +0100
Original-Received: from java.vlsivie.tuwien.ac.at by kodiak.vlsivie.tuwien.ac.at with esmtp
	(Smail3.1.29.1 #9) id m0tyevD-000TYJC; Mon, 18 Mar 96 14:24 MET
Original-Received: by java.vlsivie.tuwien.ac.at (Smail3.1.29.1 #9)
	id m0tyevC-0000lWC; Mon, 18 Mar 96 14:24 MET
Original-Sender: albrecht@java.vlsivie.tuwien.ac.at
Original-To: hardaker@ece.ucdavis.edu
X-Attribution: A
In-Reply-To: hardaker@ece.ucdavis.edu's message of 11 Mar 1996 10:31:26 -0800
Original-Lines: 20
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:5567
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:5567

>>>>> Wes Hardaker writes:

>>>>> "Lars" == Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@ifi.uio.no> writes:
Lars> Jack Vinson <jvinson@cheux.ecs.umass.edu> writes:
> Should cached articles get sorted along with all the rest of
> them?

Lars> Yes.

W> You know, I've been wanting to have a sort function that checked to
W> see if something was ticked or cached or whatever (ie, sort based on
W> article marks).  For instance, I want all my ticked articles to be at
W> the top.  This of course gets more complex when threads are involved.
W> Arg.  I haven't looked into writing this function yet...

why not raise the score on ticking and then sort the threads via score?

don't know if it works - just seemed to me the first thing to try.

albrecht