From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/10187 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: savoie@fsl.noaa.gov (Matthew H. Savoie) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: broken? was: horrid color choices in 5.4.25 Date: 11 Mar 1997 09:17:05 -0700 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035150098 22929 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:41:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:41:38 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id IAA02559 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 08:34:18 -0800 Original-Received: from cedar. (cedar.fsl.noaa.gov [137.75.71.76]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 17:17:13 +0100 Original-Received: by cedar. (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id QAA02246; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 16:17:05 GMT Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.25/Emacs 19.34 In-Reply-To: James Kanze's message of 11 Mar 1997 15:30:13 +0100 Original-Lines: 22 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10187 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10187 > Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > > |> I think one can draw the conclusion that the new colors are an > |> incomplete success. :-) > Not that I don't like the new colors, but is there something new broken with the scheme. I was meeting a friend for drinks at a local brewpub at 8:30 and found this line to be hilighted in my *wide reply....* buffer. Therefore: I'm not sure if this is something that can be fixed? Should be fixed or is just strange behavior. Same thing happens in the last line of my signature. Thanks MHS -- Matthew H. Savoie Systems Technology Associates Systems Analyst Supporting NOAA Profiler Network ph. 303.497.6642 Demonstration Division/FSL/ERL mailto: savoie@fsl.noaa.gov