From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/9554
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Ken Raeburn <raeburn@cygnus.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Kerberos functionality?
Date: 22 Jan 1997 19:30:35 -0500
Sender: raeburn@cygnus.com
Message-ID: <tx1680ps05w.fsf@cygnus.com>
References: <199701221709.MAA04970@nda.nda.com> <x7680ptppc.fsf@gkar.asds.com> <uwwt51j62.fsf@maru.schenley.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035149562 19164 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:32:42 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:32:42 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2])
	by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id QAA12985
	for <steve@miranova.com>; Wed, 22 Jan 1997 16:44:20 -0800
Original-Received: from cygnus.com (cygnus.com [205.180.230.20]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <BAA18747@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Thu, 23 Jan 1997 01:30:43 +0100
Original-Received: from tweedledumb.cygnus.com (tweedledumb.cygnus.com [192.80.44.1]) by cygnus.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id QAA05643; Wed, 22 Jan 1997 16:30:38 -0800
Original-Received: from cujo.cygnus.com by tweedledumb.cygnus.com (4.1/4.7) id AA06171; Wed, 22 Jan 97 19:30:37 EST
Original-Received: by cujo.cygnus.com; (5.65v3.2/1.1.8.2/20Sep95-0235PM)
	id AA03220; Wed, 22 Jan 1997 19:30:36 -0500
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
In-Reply-To: "Michael Welsh Duggan"'s message of 22 Jan 1997 16:42:13 -0500
Original-Lines: 14
X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.76/Emacs 19.34
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9554
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9554

"Michael Welsh Duggan" <md5i@schenley.com> writes:

> Actually, high on my wish list is Kerberos for emacs, in the c-code,
> with some functions to access it.  (Maybe integrated into
> open-network-stream.)

Go for it!  But put plenty of thought into how interrupts should be
dealt with, blocking network i/o, that sort of thing.

I don't think integrating into open-network-stream is the best way,
though a lisp function that calls open-network-stream and then calls
krb-sendauth on the subprocess object would be very useful.

Of course, that still doesn't get us encryption....